Simplify python dataset construction#578
Conversation
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #578 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 74.51% 74.51%
========================================
Files 26 26
Lines 7895 7899 +4
Branches 1638 1635 -3
========================================
+ Hits 5883 5886 +3
Misses 1534 1534
- Partials 478 479 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
Can you change the base branch from develop to #576 for ease of review? |
c349694 to
9202b8c
Compare
Sorry, I've missed this point |
9202b8c to
0727fee
Compare
0727fee to
c2af940
Compare
c2af940 to
53e4d74
Compare
Signed-off-by: Cristian Le <[email protected]>
53e4d74 to
79147bf
Compare
|
How to handle the issue in #616 ? I think it is fine to bypass and merge this PR although the bilbao's link is also broken in this PR |
Yes, just double check that it is the only faiand bypass it for now |

For now we make the dict from the python side directly. A further simplification would be to move the class inside as a C++ class or making it a thin wrapper of one. That I will probably postpone until we get enough familiarity with the tools.
Depends-on: #576