Skip to content

Add url_for_version function and gtk variant#704

Merged
tgamblin merged 1 commit intospack:developfrom
adamjstewart:features/qt-url
Mar 31, 2016
Merged

Add url_for_version function and gtk variant#704
tgamblin merged 1 commit intospack:developfrom
adamjstewart:features/qt-url

Conversation

@adamjstewart
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I messed up #427 when trying to resolve conflicts, so here it is again.


depends_on("glib")
depends_on("gtkplus")
depends_on("gtkplus", when='+gtk')
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mathstuf: @adamjstewart: @lee218llnl do you know of anything that relies on GTK support in Qt? This change makes gtk off by default, so other packages may need to ask specifically for it. Is it better to build Qt with gtk by default?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was done by request of #166. I'll let you guys decide whether it should default to True or False.

@tgamblin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Asked @alfredo-gimenez. I do not believe he needs this for MemAxes. I think that is all. If there are packages that need Qt/GTK they will need to update their variants. Seems reasonable to have this off by default.

@tgamblin tgamblin merged commit c5f3475 into spack:develop Mar 31, 2016
@tgamblin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@adamjstewart @alfredo-gimenez points out that when ~gtk, there should probably be a config option to disable gtk, or this will pull in a system gtk.

@adamjstewart
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

I'll add another PR to fix that. I don't think I can just push to the same branch, right?

@mathstuf
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

You can, but will need a new PR with a differently named branch or not.

@adamjstewart adamjstewart deleted the features/qt-url branch March 31, 2016 19:20
matz-e pushed a commit to matz-e/spack that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants