Skip to content

(py-)onnx: add v1.17.0#49287

Merged
tldahlgren merged 2 commits intodevelopfrom
hkphysics/dev/20241213-py-onnx
Mar 13, 2025
Merged

(py-)onnx: add v1.17.0#49287
tldahlgren merged 2 commits intodevelopfrom
hkphysics/dev/20241213-py-onnx

Conversation

@wdconinc
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@wdconinc wdconinc commented Mar 4, 2025

This PR adds onnx and py-onnx, v1.17.0. It is a reprise of #48090 where no response from submitter. py-onnx is built in gitlab CI, but onnx isn't.

Test builds:

[+]  adm56ai [email protected]~ipo build_system=cmake build_type=Release generator=ninja
[+]  a5x7s6c [email protected] build_system=python_pip

@wdconinc wdconinc requested a review from adamjstewart March 4, 2025 18:10
@spackbot-app
Copy link
Copy Markdown

spackbot-app bot commented Mar 4, 2025

Hi @wdconinc! I noticed that the following package(s) don't yet have maintainers:

  • onnx
  • py-onnx

Are you interested in adopting any of these package(s)? If so, simply add the following to the package class:

    maintainers("wdconinc")

If not, could you contact the developers of this package and see if they are interested? You can quickly see who has worked on a package with spack blame:

$ spack blame onnx

Thank you for your help! Please don't add maintainers without their consent.

You don't have to be a Spack expert or package developer in order to be a "maintainer," it just gives us a list of users willing to review PRs or debug issues relating to this package. A package can have multiple maintainers; just add a list of GitHub handles of anyone who wants to volunteer.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@tldahlgren tldahlgren left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Confirmed the sha256s. Thanks for building it.

@tldahlgren tldahlgren merged commit cac0bea into develop Mar 13, 2025
16 checks passed
@tldahlgren tldahlgren deleted the hkphysics/dev/20241213-py-onnx branch March 13, 2025 02:02
@tldahlgren tldahlgren self-assigned this Mar 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants