Skip to content

onnx/py-onnx: update to 1.17.0#48090

Closed
joequant wants to merge 1 commit intospack:developfrom
hkphysics:dev/20241213-py-onnx
Closed

onnx/py-onnx: update to 1.17.0#48090
joequant wants to merge 1 commit intospack:developfrom
hkphysics:dev/20241213-py-onnx

Conversation

@joequant
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

update to 1.17.0

@spackbot-app
Copy link
Copy Markdown

spackbot-app bot commented Dec 13, 2024

Hi @joequant! I noticed that the following package(s) don't yet have maintainers:

  • onnx
  • py-onnx

Are you interested in adopting any of these package(s)? If so, simply add the following to the package class:

    maintainers("joequant")

If not, could you contact the developers of this package and see if they are interested? You can quickly see who has worked on a package with spack blame:

$ spack blame onnx

Thank you for your help! Please don't add maintainers without their consent.

You don't have to be a Spack expert or package developer in order to be a "maintainer," it just gives us a list of users willing to review PRs or debug issues relating to this package. A package can have multiple maintainers; just add a list of GitHub handles of anyone who wants to volunteer.

@tldahlgren
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@spackbot run pipeline

@spackbot-app
Copy link
Copy Markdown

spackbot-app bot commented Dec 13, 2024

I've started that pipeline for you!

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@wdconinc wdconinc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CMake minimum version update required.

@wdconinc wdconinc self-assigned this Dec 14, 2024
@wdconinc wdconinc mentioned this pull request Mar 4, 2025
@wdconinc
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

wdconinc commented Mar 4, 2025

Moved to #49287.

@wdconinc wdconinc closed this Mar 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants