Skip to content

Use correct method for selecting compiler names.#34175

Merged
eugeneswalker merged 5 commits intodevelopfrom
wspear-patch-1
Dec 2, 2022
Merged

Use correct method for selecting compiler names.#34175
eugeneswalker merged 5 commits intodevelopfrom
wspear-patch-1

Conversation

@wspear
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@wspear wspear commented Nov 28, 2022

No description provided.

eugeneswalker
eugeneswalker previously approved these changes Nov 29, 2022
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@eugeneswalker eugeneswalker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@wspear
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

wspear commented Nov 30, 2022

@spackbot fix style

@spackbot-app
Copy link
Copy Markdown

spackbot-app bot commented Nov 30, 2022

Let me see if I can fix that for you!

@spackbot-app
Copy link
Copy Markdown

spackbot-app bot commented Nov 30, 2022

I was able to run spack style --fix for you!

spack style --fix
==> Running style checks on spack
  selected: isort, mypy, black, flake8
==> Modified files
  var/spack/repos/builtin/packages/tau/package.py
==> Running isort checks
  isort checks were clean
==> Running mypy checks
lib/spack/llnl/util/lang.py:1064: note: By default the bodies of untyped functions are not checked, consider using --check-untyped-defs  [annotation-unchecked]
lib/spack/spack/util/timer.py:68: note: By default the bodies of untyped functions are not checked, consider using --check-untyped-defs  [annotation-unchecked]
lib/spack/spack/bootstrap.py:87: note: By default the bodies of untyped functions are not checked, consider using --check-untyped-defs  [annotation-unchecked]
lib/spack/spack/build_environment.py:290: note: By default the bodies of untyped functions are not checked, consider using --check-untyped-defs  [annotation-unchecked]
Success: no issues found in 566 source files
  mypy checks were clean
==> Running black checks
reformatted var/spack/repos/builtin/packages/tau/package.py
All done! ✨ 🍰 ✨
1 file reformatted.
  black checks were clean
==> Running flake8 checks
  flake8 checks were clean
==> spack style checks were clean
Keep in mind that I cannot fix your flake8 or mypy errors, so if you have any you'll need to fix them and update the pull request. If I was able to push to your branch, if you make further changes you will need to pull from your updated branch before pushing again.

I've updated the branch with style fixes.

@eugeneswalker eugeneswalker merged commit 8f52090 into develop Dec 2, 2022
@eugeneswalker eugeneswalker deleted the wspear-patch-1 branch December 2, 2022 23:02
luke-dt pushed a commit to dantaslab/spack that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2022
amd-toolchain-support pushed a commit to amd-toolchain-support/spack that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants