Hi @alalazo! I noticed that the following package(s) don't yet have maintainers:

• oce

Are you interested in adopting any of these package(s)? If so, simply add the following to the package class:

    maintainers = ["alalazo"]

If not, could you contact the developers of this package and see if they are interested? You can quickly see who has worked on a package with spack blame:

$ spack blame oce

Thank you for your help! Please don't add maintainers without their consent.

You don't have to be a Spack expert or package developer in order to be a "maintainer," it just gives us a list of users willing to review PRs or debug issues relating to this package. A package can have multiple maintainers; just add a list of GitHub handles of anyone who wants to volunteer.

@luca-heltai @balay This PR and #33550 together should bring back intel-tbb into dealii concretization (I'm referring to #30738 (comment)) That said I think oce is outdated and we should probably use opencascade as a dependency. Did any of you already try that?

[balay@pj01 spack]$ ./bin/spack  spec dealii%[email protected] |grep intel-
        ^[email protected]%[email protected]~advisor~clck+daal~gdb~ilp64~inspector+ipp~itac+mkl+mpi~newdtags+rpath+shared+tbb~vtune auto_dispatch=none build_system=generic threads=none arch=linux-fedora37-skylake
[balay@pj01 spack]$ patch -Np1 < 33553.patch 
patching file var/spack/repos/builtin/packages/oce/package.py
[balay@pj01 spack]$ ./bin/spack  spec dealii%[email protected] |grep intel-
            ^[email protected]%[email protected]+shared+tm build_system=makefile cxxstd=default patches=62ba015,ce1fb16,d62cb66 arch=linux-fedora37-skylake

So this PR does help. Thanks!

also cc: @bangerth