Skip to content

lerc: add libs property#31684

Merged
alalazo merged 2 commits intospack:developfrom
adamjstewart:packages/lerc
Aug 1, 2022
Merged

lerc: add libs property#31684
alalazo merged 2 commits intospack:developfrom
adamjstewart:packages/lerc

Conversation

@adamjstewart
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@adamjstewart adamjstewart commented Jul 21, 2022

Fixes #31680
Closes #31583

@robertkb can you test this?

@spackbot-app
Copy link
Copy Markdown

spackbot-app bot commented Jul 21, 2022

Hi @adamjstewart! I noticed that the following package(s) don't yet have maintainers:

  • lerc

Are you interested in adopting any of these package(s)? If so, simply add the following to the package class:

    maintainers = ['adamjstewart']

If not, could you contact the developers of this package and see if they are interested? You can quickly see who has worked on a package with spack blame:

$ spack blame lerc

Thank you for your help! Please don't add maintainers without their consent.

You don't have to be a Spack expert or package developer in order to be a "maintainer," it just gives us a list of users willing to review PRs or debug issues relating to this package. A package can have multiple maintainers; just add a list of GitHub handles of anyone who wants to volunteer.

@robertkb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

It works for me. Thanks.

@alalazo alalazo enabled auto-merge (squash) August 1, 2022 18:28
@alalazo alalazo self-assigned this Aug 1, 2022
@alalazo alalazo merged commit 77537fa into spack:develop Aug 1, 2022
@adamjstewart adamjstewart deleted the packages/lerc branch August 1, 2022 21:43
bhatiaharsh pushed a commit to bhatiaharsh/spack that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2022
@climbfuji
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@alalazo @adamjstewart I was having the same problem and pulled in spack develop as of a few days ago. I can see the commit in git log, but if I look at https://github.com/spack/spack/blob/develop/var/spack/repos/builtin/packages/lerc/package.py I don't see the actual change. Do you know what happened?

climbfuji pushed a commit to climbfuji/spack that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2022
@climbfuji
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

For now, I cherry-picked your commit 77537fa again on top of develop (b1e499d) that I pulled in on Aug 15, and now I can see the change in the lerc package.

@adamjstewart
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

It looks like it was removed in 08e75f7. There are also other new features that were accidentally reverted in that commit. @renjithravindrankannath @cgmb @srekolam I think what happened was that there was a bad rebase of #31591 that pulled in a bunch of changes from develop, then those changes were undone in multiple commits like 3bc3c80. So the PR branch shows no changes, but in reality that PR undoes those changes. @alalazo what's the best thing to do here? Revert 08e75f7 or manually re-add the removed features?

@climbfuji
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

It looks like it was removed in 08e75f7. There are also other new features that were accidentally reverted in that commit. @renjithravindrankannath @cgmb @srekolam I think what happened was that there was a bad rebase of #31591 that pulled in a bunch of changes from develop, then those changes were undone in multiple commits like 3bc3c80. So the PR branch shows no changes, but in reality that PR undoes those changes. @alalazo what's the best thing to do here? Revert 08e75f7 or manually re-add the removed features?

Thanks, @adamjstewart for looking into this so quickly.

@adamjstewart
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Honestly this feels like a security vulnerability in GitHub. Contributors shouldn't be able to remove commits from a project in a PR when the diff shows no visible changes. Going to report this to the folks at GitHub.

alalazo pushed a commit to alalazo/spack that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2022
haampie pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2022
@srekolam
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Apologies!! i think it was all okay when the initial PR #31591 was raised and addressed the review comments but later it was bad rebase that showed changes that was not intended to in that PR . So, it was taken out from that PR.

@renjithravindrankannath
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

renjithravindrankannath commented Aug 17, 2022

Sorry about that...!! The commit 08e75f7 was not intended and I reverted the unintended changes manually. But I think it was lost after a rebase and it didn't list in the list of changes before merge.

marcost2 pushed a commit to marcost2/spack that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2022
ma595 pushed a commit to ma595/spack that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Installation issue: gdal+lerc

6 participants