Conversation
Older versions have compile errors under newer compilers (e.g., gcc-12).
|
Hi @mathstuf! I noticed that the following package(s) don't yet have maintainers:
Are you interested in adopting any of these package(s)? If so, simply add the following to the package class: maintainers = ['mathstuf']If not, could you contact the developers of this package and see if they are interested? You can quickly see who has worked on a package with $ spack blame protobufThank you for your help! Please don't add maintainers without their consent. You don't have to be a Spack expert or package developer in order to be a "maintainer," it just gives us a list of users willing to review PRs or debug issues relating to this package. A package can have multiple maintainers; just add a list of GitHub handles of anyone who wants to volunteer. |
adamjstewart
left a comment
adamjstewart
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This should be fun. The latest version of py-protobuf broke pretty much every DL library (protocolbuffers/protobuf#10051), so I can't imagine what a huge change in versioning scheme will do.
Older versions have compile errors under newer compilers (e.g., gcc-12).
2 participants
Older versions have compile errors under newer compilers (e.g., gcc-12).