Skip to content

e4s ci stack: update to reflect current status#31032

Merged
eugeneswalker merged 1 commit intospack:developfrom
eugeneswalker:e4s-june-sync
Jul 14, 2022
Merged

e4s ci stack: update to reflect current status#31032
eugeneswalker merged 1 commit intospack:developfrom
eugeneswalker:e4s-june-sync

Conversation

@eugeneswalker
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@eugeneswalker eugeneswalker commented Jun 7, 2022

Bring E4S stack up to date

  • Add +rocm specs
  • Sync package preferences
  • New runner image: ecpe4s/ubuntu22.04-runner-x86_64:2022-07-01 w/ %[email protected]

@spackbot-app spackbot-app bot added the gitlab Issues related to gitlab integration label Jun 7, 2022
@eugeneswalker eugeneswalker force-pushed the e4s-june-sync branch 2 times, most recently from 0f49a02 to aac21a8 Compare June 7, 2022 21:13
@alalazo alalazo self-assigned this Jun 8, 2022
@eugeneswalker eugeneswalker force-pushed the e4s-june-sync branch 3 times, most recently from 2d34182 to 9531243 Compare June 9, 2022 22:38
@eugeneswalker eugeneswalker force-pushed the e4s-june-sync branch 3 times, most recently from aaff260 to 8b5f1d5 Compare June 27, 2022 18:19
@eugeneswalker eugeneswalker force-pushed the e4s-june-sync branch 2 times, most recently from 4b1883a to 6d09565 Compare July 11, 2022 13:49
@eugeneswalker eugeneswalker force-pushed the e4s-june-sync branch 10 times, most recently from 23165fd to ecccc61 Compare July 14, 2022 16:36
@eugeneswalker eugeneswalker enabled auto-merge (squash) July 14, 2022 21:14
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@wspear wspear left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me.

@eugeneswalker eugeneswalker merged commit 3cb6fd1 into spack:develop Jul 14, 2022
@scottwittenburg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Normally we were pushing images used by gitlab ci to github container registry to avoid getting rate limited on pulls. Since I haven't heard any complaints about it since this was merged, I wonder if that's still necessary? Is it just that in two weeks we didn't run enough e4s jobs to trigger the limit? Or is that dockerhub granted spack open source project status and removed the limit?

bhatiaharsh pushed a commit to bhatiaharsh/spack that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

e4s gitlab Issues related to gitlab integration

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants