Skip to content

add a path argument to the stage command#291

Merged
tgamblin merged 2 commits intospack:developfrom
trws:stage-path
Mar 31, 2016
Merged

add a path argument to the stage command#291
tgamblin merged 2 commits intospack:developfrom
trws:stage-path

Conversation

@trws
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@trws trws commented Dec 30, 2015

Allow users to use spack to stage a, potentially complex, package into a
given path. This is nice for packages with multiple resources that must
be placed, for example LLVM with all sub-projects.

This may not be the preferred way to do this, but seemed to be the least impact change.

@mathstuf
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

+1 I like this, but it needs a rebase.

@tgamblin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@trws: sorry I didn't merge this. If you rebase we can add it.

trws added 2 commits March 31, 2016 09:56
Allow users to use spack to stage a, potentially complex, package into a
given path.  This is nice for packages with multiple resources that must
be placed, for example LLVM with all sub-projects.
This version actually pulls the path through the package to deliver it
to each stage on creation when passed through the command.  This is
necessary due to the new StageComposite class that makes setting the
path directly on the stage impractical, it also takes the logic out of
package for the most part, which seems like an improvement.
@trws
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

trws commented Mar 31, 2016

It's rebased, and due to StageComposite somewhat reworked. Assuming it passes, which it seems to based on my local testing, glance over it and it should be good to go.

@mathstuf
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

LGTM.

@tgamblin tgamblin merged commit 1f93c39 into spack:develop Mar 31, 2016
matz-e added a commit to matz-e/spack that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2020
climbfuji pushed a commit to climbfuji/spack that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2023
Add MPI (MPI_Fint/mpi_comm_f2c) patch to scotch/parmetis
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants