Fix "build systems" Gitlab pipeline#28360
Conversation
scottwittenburg
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approve, thanks! I expect this to survive the "naughty list" check since it removes the spec known to be broken on develop.
|
@scottwittenburg Yeah, let's see if there is anything else to evict from the list 😈 |
You're right, since there are two pythons in the build_systems concretization report (or staging report, whatever I call it), I guess there may be something else bringing in that other python. |
|
Hmm, this is weird. I checked and I think:
🤔 |
|
@scottwittenburg I got the link above by just clicking "Details" EDIT: Ugh, it's not from this PR! |
|
That ☝️ is from the |
|
Yeah, the misleading point is that if I click "Details" in this PR I get redirected to the pipeline I posted, which is confusing... |
Yeah, maybe it's confusing that the details in that case links to the pipeline that is blocking this one, when normally details links to the running pipeline for this PR. What do you think @zackgalbreath? |
|
Sorry for repeated cross-posting. |
That was the motivation, yes. I thought it would be helpful to have a link to the currently running develop pipeline that's blocking this PR as the status message indicates. But we can remove it if you think that's not a good idea. |
|
The check still says "Pending - waiting for base develop commit pipeline to succeed" but the develop pipeline finished already. |
|
We're trying to keep track of these PRs where we push a branch to gitlab but it doesn't a pipeline. I added this one to the list. Now that we had a chance to look into why this one didn't run, I'll ask spackbot to do it. |
|
@spackbot run pipeline |
|
I've started that pipeline for you! |
|
Looks like the |
|
@alalazo is this still a draft? |


Modifications: