Skip to content

Splice across names#27919

Merged
becker33 merged 95 commits intospack:developfrom
nhanford:features/splice-swap-names
Apr 12, 2022
Merged

Splice across names#27919
becker33 merged 95 commits intospack:developfrom
nhanford:features/splice-swap-names

Conversation

@nhanford
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Update method splice in spec.py to be able to splice specs with different names, so long as they provide the same virtuals.
For example, hdf5 will now be able to splice mpich in for openmpi since they both provide mpi.

becker33
becker33 previously approved these changes Apr 12, 2022
dep.concretize()
out = spec.splice(dep, transitive)
assert dep.name in out
assert transitive == ('+foo' in str(out['splice-z']))
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No need to str the spec for this check.

@becker33 becker33 merged commit a3520d1 into spack:develop Apr 12, 2022
joequant pushed a commit to hkphysics/spack that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2022
becker33 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2024
This PR allows users to configure explicit splicing replacement of an abstract spec in the concretizer.

concretizer:
  splice:
    explicit:
    - target: mpi
      replacement: mpich/abcdef
      transitive: true

This config block would mean "for any spec that concretizes to use mpi, splice in mpich/abcdef in place of the mpi it would naturally concretize to use. See #20262, #26873, #27919, and #46382 for PRs enabling splicing in the Spec object. This PR will be the first place the splice method is used in a user-facing manner. See https://spack.readthedocs.io/en/latest/spack.html#spack.spec.Spec.splice for more information on splicing.

This will allow users to reuse generic public binaries while splicing in the performant local mpi implementation on their system.

In the config file, the target may be any abstract spec. The replacement must be a spec that includes an abstract hash `/abcdef`. The transitive key is optional, defaulting to true if left out.

Two important items to note:

1. When writing explicit splice config, the user is in charge of ensuring that the replacement specs they use are binary compatible with whatever targets they replace. In practice, this will likely require either specific knowledge of what packages will be installed by the user's workflow, or somewhat more specific abstract "target" specs for splicing, to ensure binary compatibility.
2. Explicit splices can cause the output of the concretizer not to satisfy the input. For example, using the config above and consider a package in a binary cache `hdf5/xyzabc` that depends on mvapich2. Then the command `spack install hdf5/xyzabc` will instead install the result of splicing `mpich/abcdef` into `hdf5/xyzabc` in place of whatever mvapich2 spec it previously depended on. When this occurs, a warning message is printed `Warning: explicit splice configuration has caused the the concretized spec {concrete_spec} not to satisfy the input spec {input_spec}".

Highlighted technical details of implementation:

1. This PR required modifying the installer to have two separate types of Tasks, `RewireTask` and `BuildTask`. Spliced specs are queued as `RewireTask` and standard specs are queued as `BuildTask`. Each spliced spec retains a pointer to its build_spec for provenance. If a RewireTask is dequeued and the associated `build_spec` is neither available in the install_tree nor from a binary cache, the RewireTask is requeued with a new dependency on a BuildTask for the build_spec, and BuildTasks are queued for the build spec and its dependencies.
2. Relocation is modified so that a spack binary can be simultaneously installed and rewired. This ensures that installing the build_spec is not necessary when splicing from a binary cache.
3. The splicing model is modified to more accurately represent build dependencies -- that is, spliced specs do not have build dependencies, as spliced specs are never built. Their build_specs retain the build dependencies, as they may be built as part of installing the spliced spec.
4. There were vestiges of the compiler bootstrapping logic that were not removed in #46237 because I asked alalazo to leave them in to avoid making the rebase for this PR harder than it needed to be. Those last remains are removed in this PR.

Co-authored-by: Nathan Hanford <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Gregory Becker <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Tamara Dahlgren <[email protected]>
arezaii pushed a commit to arezaii/spack that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2024
This PR allows users to configure explicit splicing replacement of an abstract spec in the concretizer.

concretizer:
  splice:
    explicit:
    - target: mpi
      replacement: mpich/abcdef
      transitive: true

This config block would mean "for any spec that concretizes to use mpi, splice in mpich/abcdef in place of the mpi it would naturally concretize to use. See spack#20262, spack#26873, spack#27919, and spack#46382 for PRs enabling splicing in the Spec object. This PR will be the first place the splice method is used in a user-facing manner. See https://spack.readthedocs.io/en/latest/spack.html#spack.spec.Spec.splice for more information on splicing.

This will allow users to reuse generic public binaries while splicing in the performant local mpi implementation on their system.

In the config file, the target may be any abstract spec. The replacement must be a spec that includes an abstract hash `/abcdef`. The transitive key is optional, defaulting to true if left out.

Two important items to note:

1. When writing explicit splice config, the user is in charge of ensuring that the replacement specs they use are binary compatible with whatever targets they replace. In practice, this will likely require either specific knowledge of what packages will be installed by the user's workflow, or somewhat more specific abstract "target" specs for splicing, to ensure binary compatibility.
2. Explicit splices can cause the output of the concretizer not to satisfy the input. For example, using the config above and consider a package in a binary cache `hdf5/xyzabc` that depends on mvapich2. Then the command `spack install hdf5/xyzabc` will instead install the result of splicing `mpich/abcdef` into `hdf5/xyzabc` in place of whatever mvapich2 spec it previously depended on. When this occurs, a warning message is printed `Warning: explicit splice configuration has caused the the concretized spec {concrete_spec} not to satisfy the input spec {input_spec}".

Highlighted technical details of implementation:

1. This PR required modifying the installer to have two separate types of Tasks, `RewireTask` and `BuildTask`. Spliced specs are queued as `RewireTask` and standard specs are queued as `BuildTask`. Each spliced spec retains a pointer to its build_spec for provenance. If a RewireTask is dequeued and the associated `build_spec` is neither available in the install_tree nor from a binary cache, the RewireTask is requeued with a new dependency on a BuildTask for the build_spec, and BuildTasks are queued for the build spec and its dependencies.
2. Relocation is modified so that a spack binary can be simultaneously installed and rewired. This ensures that installing the build_spec is not necessary when splicing from a binary cache.
3. The splicing model is modified to more accurately represent build dependencies -- that is, spliced specs do not have build dependencies, as spliced specs are never built. Their build_specs retain the build dependencies, as they may be built as part of installing the spliced spec.
4. There were vestiges of the compiler bootstrapping logic that were not removed in spack#46237 because I asked alalazo to leave them in to avoid making the rebase for this PR harder than it needed to be. Those last remains are removed in this PR.

Co-authored-by: Nathan Hanford <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Gregory Becker <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Tamara Dahlgren <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants