keeper: improve wal_level selection#450
Merged
sgotti merged 1 commit intoFeb 27, 2018
Merged
Conversation
* Read the user provided pgParameters and if the provided wal_level is "logical" use it, other values (invalid or unsupported) will return the default stolon wal_level. * Also if hot_standby is valid for every supported version let's prefer "replica" when using postgres >= 9.6
sgotti
force-pushed
the
keeper_improve_wal_level_selection
branch
from
a5d55bf to
616c08b
Compare
sgotti
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 27, 2018
keeper: improve wal_level selection
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Read the user provided pgParameters and if the provided wal_level is "logical"
use it, other values (invalid or unsupported) will return the default stolon wal_level.
Also if hot_standby is valid for every supported version let's prefer
"replica" when using postgres >= 9.6