Skip to content

add TypeHierarchy doc#959

Merged
swissiety merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
doc/typehierarchy
Jul 1, 2024
Merged

add TypeHierarchy doc#959
swissiety merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
doc/typehierarchy

Conversation

@swissiety
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Documentation Preview.

@swissiety swissiety requested a review from stschott July 1, 2024 07:42
* For an interface type, this does the same as {@link #implementersOf(ClassType)}. For a class
* type, this does the same as {@link #subclassesOf(ClassType)}.
*/
// TODO: [ms] check! not sure this method makes sense in the interface..
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Interfaces can extend from each other, so a subtype of an interface are interfaces.
It could be also that this methods also returns classes that implement the given interface

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • if we need it semantically - it seemed like a method that was extracted from the implementation class

@swissiety swissiety merged commit c553f63 into develop Jul 1, 2024
@swissiety swissiety deleted the doc/typehierarchy branch July 1, 2024 13:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants