Test submit OTSS and Syncd-ot code#8
Closed
sonic-otn wants to merge 0 commit intosonic-otn:otn_pre_202411from
Closed
Test submit OTSS and Syncd-ot code#8sonic-otn wants to merge 0 commit intosonic-otn:otn_pre_202411from
sonic-otn wants to merge 0 commit intosonic-otn:otn_pre_202411from
Conversation
jjin62
reviewed
Jan 11, 2024
|
|
||
| PLATFORM_PATH := platform/$(if $(PLATFORM),$(PLATFORM),$(CONFIGURED_PLATFORM)) | ||
| PLATFORM_CHECKOUT := platform/checkout | ||
| PLATFORM_ROOT := $(if $(shell echo $(PLATFORM) | grep 'ot-'),ot-platform,platform) |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
grep 'ot-' will pick up all the platform name include the substring "ot-", such as "slot-", "hot-"
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
all platforms (total 9) in sonic are under 'platform' directory. ot-platform folder diverges from existing directory structure? I don't see any technical reason for that.
|
|
||
| #include different configurations based on target platform | ||
| ifneq ($(shell echo $(CONFIGURED_PLATFORM) | grep 'ot-'),) | ||
| include rules/config-ot |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
rule/config is meant for each vendor to edit to fit their device features. We can always add more nobs, No need to introduce a new file config-ot. I don't see rules/config-ot file in this PR.
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this is generated file, should not be checked in.
| $(LIBOTAIVS_DBG) | ||
|
|
||
| $(DOCKER_SYNCD_BASE)_VERSION = 1.0.0 | ||
| $(DOCKER_SYNCD_BASE)_PACKAGE_NAME = syncd-ot-vs |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
docker package name should not include platform name, as all platforms should have the same syncd-ot as image/package name. as in existing sonic, all platform has docker "syncd".
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
should not check in buildinfo.
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this working in the demo? this is to generate a kvm image bounded with onie image. so you can start kvm sonic in one step. But I saw that ALi demo, still two steps: 1) start onie 2) install sonic-ot-vs.
| SONIC_KVM_IMAGE = sonic-ot-vs.img.gz | ||
| $(SONIC_KVM_IMAGE)_INSTALLS += $(SYSTEMD_SONIC_GENERATOR) \ | ||
| $(KVM_4_SLOT_FACTORY_CONFIG) | ||
| $(SONIC_KVM_IMAGE)_MACHINE = ot-vs |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
change name to ot-kvm, you need build an new onie. because we use existing onie for vs, so the kvm image has to be ended with "vs"
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ONIE should be build by each device vendor to preinstall on their product.
In our case a new onie should be build for ot-kvm, see https://github.com/jjin62/onie/tree/2018.11br. you can compile it or just use the iso. (https://github.com/jjin62/onie/tree/2018.11br/build/images) ONIE for Molex device (based on x86): https://github.com/jjin62/onie/tree/2022.08br.
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
files in template directory are duplicated from /platform/template. Can we make a soft link to original directory?
jjin62
reviewed
Jan 11, 2024
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this is for Mininet topology. remove?
jjin62
reviewed
Jan 11, 2024
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No need to have a separate config file file for OT. This file is meant for vendor to customize. In reality, no one would build a SONiC as is, Vendors always have their own distribution.
sonic-otn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2024
…et#21095) Adding the below fix from FRR FRRouting/frr#17297 This is to fix the following crash which is a statistical issue [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". Core was generated by `/usr/lib/frr/zebra -A 127.0.0.1 -s 90000000 -M dplane_fpm_nl -M snmp'. Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted. #0 0x00007fccd7351e2c in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 [Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x7fccd6faf7c0 (LWP 36))] (gdb) bt #0 0x00007fccd7351e2c in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #1 0x00007fccd7302fb2 in raise () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #2 0x00007fccd72ed472 in abort () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #3 0x00007fccd75bb3a9 in _zlog_assert_failed (xref=xref@entry=0x7fccd7652380 <_xref.16>, extra=extra@entry=0x0) at ../lib/zlog.c:678 #4 0x00007fccd759b2fe in route_node_delete (node=<optimized out>) at ../lib/table.c:352 #5 0x00007fccd759b445 in route_unlock_node (node=0x0) at ../lib/table.h:258 #6 route_next (node=<optimized out>) at ../lib/table.c:436 #7 route_next (node=node@entry=0x56029d89e560) at ../lib/table.c:410 #8 0x000056029b6b6b7a in if_lookup_by_name_per_ns (ns=ns@entry=0x56029d873d90, ifname=ifname@entry=0x7fccc0029340 "PortChannel1020") at ../zebra/interface.c:312 #9 0x000056029b6b8b36 in zebra_if_dplane_ifp_handling (ctx=0x7fccc0029310) at ../zebra/interface.c:1867 #10 zebra_if_dplane_result (ctx=0x7fccc0029310) at ../zebra/interface.c:2221 #11 0x000056029b7137a9 in rib_process_dplane_results (thread=<optimized out>) at ../zebra/zebra_rib.c:4810 #12 0x00007fccd75a0e0d in thread_call (thread=thread@entry=0x7ffe8e553cc0) at ../lib/thread.c:1990 #13 0x00007fccd7559368 in frr_run (master=0x56029d65a040) at ../lib/libfrr.c:1198 #14 0x000056029b6ac317 in main (argc=9, argv=0x7ffe8e5540d8) at ../zebra/main.c:478
jjin62
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 6, 2025
…et#21405) <!-- Please make sure you've read and understood our contributing guidelines: https://github.com/Azure/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md failure_prs.log skip_prs.log Make sure all your commits include a signature generated with `git commit -s` ** If this is a bug fix, make sure your description includes "fixes #xxxx", or "closes #xxxx" or "resolves #xxxx" Please provide the following information: --> #### Why I did it Adding the below fix from FRR FRRouting/frr#17297 This is to fix the following crash which is a statistical issue ``` [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". Core was generated by `/usr/lib/frr/zebra -A 127.0.0.1 -s 90000000 -M dplane_fpm_nl -M snmp'. Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted. #0 0x00007fccd7351e2c in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 [Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x7fccd6faf7c0 (LWP 36))] (gdb) bt #0 0x00007fccd7351e2c in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #1 0x00007fccd7302fb2 in raise () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #2 0x00007fccd72ed472 in abort () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #3 0x00007fccd75bb3a9 in _zlog_assert_failed (xref=xref@entry=0x7fccd7652380 <_xref.16>, extra=extra@entry=0x0) at ../lib/zlog.c:678 #4 0x00007fccd759b2fe in route_node_delete (node=<optimized out>) at ../lib/table.c:352 #5 0x00007fccd759b445 in route_unlock_node (node=0x0) at ../lib/table.h:258 #6 route_next (node=<optimized out>) at ../lib/table.c:436 #7 route_next (node=node@entry=0x56029d89e560) at ../lib/table.c:410 #8 0x000056029b6b6b7a in if_lookup_by_name_per_ns (ns=ns@entry=0x56029d873d90, ifname=ifname@entry=0x7fccc0029340 "PortChannel1020") at ../zebra/interface.c:312 #9 0x000056029b6b8b36 in zebra_if_dplane_ifp_handling (ctx=0x7fccc0029310) at ../zebra/interface.c:1867 #10 zebra_if_dplane_result (ctx=0x7fccc0029310) at ../zebra/interface.c:2221 #11 0x000056029b7137a9 in rib_process_dplane_results (thread=<optimized out>) at ../zebra/zebra_rib.c:4810 #12 0x00007fccd75a0e0d in thread_call (thread=thread@entry=0x7ffe8e553cc0) at ../lib/thread.c:1990 #13 0x00007fccd7559368 in frr_run (master=0x56029d65a040) at ../lib/libfrr.c:1198 #14 0x000056029b6ac317 in main (argc=9, argv=0x7ffe8e5540d8) at ../zebra/main.c:478 ``` ##### Work item tracking - Microsoft ADO **(number only)**: #### How I did it Added patch. #### How to verify it Running BGP tests. <!-- If PR needs to be backported, then the PR must be tested against the base branch and the earliest backport release branch and provide tested image version on these two branches. For example, if the PR is requested for master, 202211 and 202012, then the requester needs to provide test results on master and 202012. --> #### Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected) <!-- - Note we only backport fixes to a release branch, *not* features! - Please also provide a reason for the backporting below. - e.g. - [x] 202006 --> - [ ] 201811 - [ ] 201911 - [ ] 202006 - [ ] 202012 - [ ] 202106 - [ ] 202111 - [ ] 202205 - [ ] 202211 - [ ] 202305 #### Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version) <!-- - Please provide tested image version - e.g. - [x] 20201231.100 --> - [ ] <!-- image version 1 --> - [ ] <!-- image version 2 --> #### Description for the changelog <!-- Write a short (one line) summary that describes the changes in this pull request for inclusion in the changelog: --> <!-- Ensure to add label/tag for the feature raised. example - PR#2174 under sonic-utilities repo. where, Generic Config and Update feature has been labelled as GCU. --> #### Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes <!-- Provide a link to config_db schema for the table for which YANG model is defined Link should point to correct section on https://github.com/Azure/sonic-buildimage/blob/master/src/sonic-yang-models/doc/Configuration.md --> #### A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)
jjin62
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2026
…net#25643) * [build] Add build timing report and dependency analysis tools Add three scripts for build performance instrumentation: - scripts/build-timing-report.sh: Parse per-package timing from build logs (HEADER/FOOTER timestamps), generate sorted duration table, phase breakdown, parallelism timeline, and CSV export. - scripts/build-dep-graph.py: Parse rules/*.mk dependency graph, compute critical path, fan-out/fan-in bottleneck analysis, and generate DOT/JSON output for visualization. - scripts/build-resource-monitor.sh: Sample CPU, memory, disk I/O, and Docker container count during builds for resource utilization analysis. Add "make build-report" target to slave.mk that runs the timing report and dependency analysis after a build completes. Example output from a VS build on 24-core/30GB machine: - 210 packages built in 53m wall time (173m CPU) - Max concurrency: 5 (with SONIC_CONFIG_BUILD_JOBS=4) - Critical path: 14 packages deep (libnl -> libswsscommon -> utilities) - Top bottleneck: LIBSWSSCOMMON with 48 downstream dependents Signed-off-by: Rustiqly <[email protected]> * Address Copilot review: fix 17 bugs in build analysis scripts - Use free -m with division instead of free -g to avoid rounding (#1) - Add = and ?= to Makefile dependency regex patterns (#2, #7) - CPU calculation now uses /proc/stat delta (two reads) (#3, #14) - Fix misleading 'critical path estimate' comment (#4) - Fix parallelism timeline comment (60s not 10s) (#5) - Include after-relationship packages in fan stats (#6) - Guard disk I/O division by zero when INTERVAL<=1 (#8) - Remove unused elapsed_line variable (#9) - Remove redundant LIBSWSSCOMMON_DBG check (#10) - Remove active_make_jobs from CSV header comment (#11) - Wire up _RDEPENDS parsing to build reverse deps (#12) - Remove unnecessary 'if v' filter on rdeps JSON (#13) - Remove unused REPORT_FORMAT parameter (#15) - Add cycle detection to critical path algorithm (#16) - Add execute permission check for companion scripts (#17) Signed-off-by: Rustiqly <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: Rustiqly <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Rustiqly <[email protected]>
jjin62
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2026
…dating udevd rules (sonic-net#26343) - Why I did it On SONiC SmartSwitch platforms with DPUs, systemd-udevd crashes with SIGABRT on every reboot when DPU firmware initialization is slow. During the initramfs boot phase, a standalone systemd-udevd daemon is started to handle device discovery. If DPU firmware takes longer than the 60-second udevadm settle timeout (BlueField-3 DPUs can take 120 seconds each in the failure case when they are stuck), the initramfs cannot stop this udevd before switch_root. The stale process survives into the real system but is never chrooted into the overlayfs root, leaving it with a broken filesystem view. When dpu-udev-manager.sh writes udev rules, the stale udevd detects the change and crashes on an assertion in systemd's chase() path resolution (assert(path_is_absolute(p)) at chase.c:648), because dir_fd_is_root() returns false for a process whose root still points to the initramfs rootfs rather than the overlayfs. This triggers a systemd issue : systemd/systemd#29559 which maintainers doesn't consider as a bug from systemd side. Raising this fix for our usecase. Core was generated by `/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-udevd --daemon --resolve-names=never'. Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted. #0 0x00007f29fe7f695c in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (gdb) bt #0 0x00007f29fe7f695c in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #1 0x00007f29fe7a1cc2 in raise () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #2 0x00007f29fe78a4ac in abort () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #3 0x00007f29fea50c11 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/systemd/libsystemd-shared-257.so #4 0x00007f29feb94a8b in chase () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/systemd/libsystemd-shared-257.so #5 0x00007f29feb956e2 in chase_and_opendir () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/systemd/libsystemd-shared-257.so #6 0x00007f29feb9a609 in conf_files_list_strv () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/systemd/libsystemd-shared-257.so #7 0x00007f29fea913e8 in config_get_stats_by_path () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/systemd/libsystemd-shared-257.so #8 0x0000559f295519cf in ?? () #9 0x0000559f29553a77 in ?? () #10 0x00007f29fec36055 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/systemd/libsystemd-shared-257.so #11 0x00007f29fec3668d in sd_event_dispatch () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/systemd/libsystemd-shared-257.so #12 0x00007f29fec394a8 in sd_event_run () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/systemd/libsystemd-shared-257.so #13 0x00007f29fec396c7 in sd_event_loop () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/systemd/libsystemd-shared-257.so #14 0x0000559f29545820 in ?? () #15 0x00007f29fe78bca8 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #16 0x00007f29fe78bd65 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #17 0x0000559f29545c51 in ?? () - How I did it Added a kill_stale_udevd() function to dpu-udev-manager.sh that runs before writing the udev rules. It identifies the systemd-managed udevd PID via systemctl show, then kills any other systemd-udevd --daemon process that doesn't match -- these are leftover initramfs instances. If no stale process exists (e.g. DPUs are healthy and the initramfs udevd exited cleanly), the function is a no-op. - How to verify it Deploy the image on a SmartSwitch with DPUs in a state where firmware initialization times out (>60s per DPU) by stopping image installation before firmware install step Reboot the switch Verify no new systemd-udevd coredumps in /var/core/ Verify the stale process was killed: journalctl -b 0 | grep dpu-udev-manager should show killing stale initramfs udevd PID (systemd udevd is PID ) Verify systemd-udevd.service is healthy: systemctl status systemd-udevd should show active (running) Verify DPU udev rules were written: cat /etc/udev/rules.d/92-midplane-intf.rules should contain the DPU interface naming rules Signed-off-by: Hemanth Kumar Tirupati <[email protected]>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why I did it
Work item tracking
How I did it
How to verify it
Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)
Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)
Description for the changelog
Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes
A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)