Skip to content

[action] [PR:22106] [test_frr_config_check] skip frr hidden config checking#22579

Merged
vmittal-msft merged 1 commit intosonic-net:202511from
mssonicbld:cherry/202511/22106
Feb 25, 2026
Merged

[action] [PR:22106] [test_frr_config_check] skip frr hidden config checking#22579
vmittal-msft merged 1 commit intosonic-net:202511from
mssonicbld:cherry/202511/22106

Conversation

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Description of PR

Summary:
Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • New Test case
  • Skipped for non-supported platforms
  • Test case improvement

Back port request

  • 202205
  • 202305
  • 202311
  • 202405
  • 202411
  • 202505
  • 202511

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

The PR sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#25117 would update the default value of zebra_nexthop in FRR from disable to enable.
Enable is the default configuration in FRR, it would not show in ouput of "show running" in FRR, so it would cause the test case test_frr_config_check failed once the previous PR merged.

How did you do it?

Skip the FRR hidden config check in test_frr_config_check.

How did you verify/test it?

Run the case in elastic
with fix
https://elastictest.org/scheduler/testplan/6978a655c5f3d9049fbb9138

without fix
https://elastictest.org/scheduler/testplan/6978a6671910fa9097bc5e58

Any platform specific information?

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

Documentation

)

What is the motivation for this PR?
The PR sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#25117 would update the default value of zebra_nexthop in FRR from disable to enable.
Enable is the default configuration in FRR, it would not show in ouput of "show running" in FRR, so it would cause the test case test_frr_config_check failed once the previous PR merged.

How did you do it?
Skip the FRR hidden config check in test_frr_config_check.

How did you verify/test it?
Run the case in elastic
with fix
https://elastictest.org/scheduler/testplan/6978a655c5f3d9049fbb9138

without fix
https://elastictest.org/scheduler/testplan/6978a6671910fa9097bc5e58

Signed-off-by: mssonicbld <[email protected]>
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Original PR: #22106

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@vmittal-msft vmittal-msft merged commit bb32ebd into sonic-net:202511 Feb 25, 2026
18 checks passed
kazinator-arista pushed a commit to kazinator-arista/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2026
…lly (sonic-net#22579)

#### Why I did it
src/sonic-gnmi
```
* b06ad78 - (HEAD -> 202405, origin/202405) Merge pull request sonic-net#380 from zbud-msft/cherry_pick_fix_poll_mode_behavior (2 weeks ago) [bingwang-ms]
* 15a25c5 - Stricten target name (5 weeks ago) [Zain Budhwani]
* 3bd93c0 - Fix target (5 weeks ago) [Zain Budhwani]
* 088fc88 - Remove origin from updates (5 weeks ago) [Zain Budhwani]
* 82ea717 - Fix log (5 weeks ago) [Zain Budhwani]
* a4c5d04 - Fix coverage (5 weeks ago) [Zain Budhwani]
* 9b9e860 - Fix Wildcard entries to return empty data instead of invalid path (sonic-net#299) (5 weeks ago) [Zain Budhwani]
* 418ff7f - Fix poll mode non existing table or key (5 weeks ago) [Zain Budhwani]
```
#### How I did it
#### How to verify it
#### Description for the changelog
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants