This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 13, 2022. It is now read-only.
[proposed spec change] mention PoP token issuer for app origin#34
Closed
michielbdejong wants to merge 1 commit intosolid:masterfrom
Closed
[proposed spec change] mention PoP token issuer for app origin#34michielbdejong wants to merge 1 commit intosolid:masterfrom
michielbdejong wants to merge 1 commit intosolid:masterfrom
Conversation
Creating this as a placeholder, it's still incomplete in several aspects: * we should mention somewhere why PoP token issuer is better than Origin header (namely because of solid/web-access-control-spec#34) * we should mention that a PoP token is only valid if the issuer is listed in the id token's audiences (is this something the IDP checks and then signs for? I don't even know)
This was referenced Jan 14, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Creating this as a placeholder, it's still incomplete in several aspects:
This is something we're experimenting with in IPS and that shouldn't be merged unless/until NSS also implements it.