Skip to content

[python] Min-sizing for dataframes/arrays with new shape feature#3203

Merged
johnkerl merged 1 commit intomainfrom
kerl/min-size-2
Oct 18, 2024
Merged

[python] Min-sizing for dataframes/arrays with new shape feature#3203
johnkerl merged 1 commit intomainfrom
kerl/min-size-2

Conversation

@johnkerl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@johnkerl johnkerl commented Oct 18, 2024

Issue and/or context: As tracked on issue #2407 / [sc-51048].

Note that the intended Python and R API changes are all agreed on and finalized as described in #2407.

Changes:

In the design at #2407 we decided that None no longer means "as big a domain as possible" but now rather "as small as possible" -- as only upward resizes, not downward resizes, are possible. This is a breaking change we have already agreed on.

Notes for Reviewer:

@johnkerl johnkerl changed the title [python] Min-sizing for dataframes/arrays [python] Min-sizing for dataframes/arrays with new shape feature Oct 18, 2024
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Oct 18, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 80.00000% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 83.26%. Comparing base (58ca2d0) to head (cd9ffee).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3203      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.19%   83.26%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files          51       51              
  Lines        5504     5516      +12     
==========================================
+ Hits         4579     4593      +14     
+ Misses        925      923       -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
python 83.26% <80.00%> (+0.07%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
python_api 83.26% <80.00%> (+0.07%) ⬆️
libtiledbsoma ∅ <ø> (∅)

@johnkerl johnkerl requested review from jp-dark and nguyenv October 18, 2024 14:29
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@jp-dark jp-dark left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let me verify the spatial Jupyter notebook still runs with the changes to the point cloud dataframe.

@jp-dark
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

jp-dark commented Oct 18, 2024

Let me verify the spatial Jupyter notebook still runs with the changes to the point cloud dataframe.

Success

@johnkerl johnkerl merged commit ec1826a into main Oct 18, 2024
@johnkerl johnkerl deleted the kerl/min-size-2 branch October 18, 2024 17:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants