Conversation
dc19af6 to
f1a3909
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3001 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 83.54% 83.65% +0.11%
==========================================
Files 51 51
Lines 5434 5434
==========================================
+ Hits 4540 4546 +6
+ Misses 894 888 -6
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
9616847 to
f1a3909
Compare
beed527 to
a96c72d
Compare
thetorpedodog
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
right now leaving comments as I go through each commit. apologies if this is already resolved in a later one
|
From the build log: This is because at the point this line is executed, the symbol needs to be moved above all the imports. (Alternately, it might make sense to create a |
@thetorpedodog thank you!!! I got some 'new style lint' here -- I don't know why, I didn't change any linter versions -- and was forced to move imports :( There's something weird to debug here -- I'll see if I can make everything in the CI toolchain happy simultaneously -- thank you!!! Also I'll try the |
8ff4ec3 to
f3674a9
Compare
|
And re
I have traced that to here: |
9790ab0 to
db17d38
Compare
|
Hi guys, thanks for your amazing package. I understand this is in flux as we write - as a power user I would kindly like to ask if there's anything I can do to help push this through - I really need it and workarounds are a decent pain. (As I understand, now there is a buggy typechecker stalling CI stalling 3.12 adoption, which itself was released 12 months ago. If inaccurate feel free to correct) |
|
@iosonofabio thank you! Your assessment is correct -- current status is here: #1849 (comment) and @ryan-williams will be moving this forward |
db17d38 to
6fdbd75
Compare
63b6d5e to
8c5f857
Compare
|
I can't add you as a reviewer since you opened this PR, @johnkerl, but I would like your review on the latest changes that I've pushed here 🙏 Depending on typeguard@HEAD may trip up SOMA developers who have existing typeguard 4.2.1 or 4.3.0 installations, but I'm not sure what the other option is. As soon as agronholm/typeguard#490 makes it into a release, we can move to that. Could also try to only depend on typeguard@HEAD in Python 3.12, but I thought that was more complex than it was worth. |
Agreed. And it only affects folks on 3.12, so any dev who really wants to avoid this can use 3.11. |
8c5f857 to
b7db9ed
Compare
For issue #1849 -- which has a long history.
See also #2999 and [sc-53002].
This needs single-cell-data/SOMA#222