Skip to content

Conversation

@eserilev
Copy link
Member

Issue Addressed

Holesky - #8096
Hoodi - #8097
Sepolia - #8099

Proposed Changes

Testnet configs for Holesky, Hoodi and Sepolia

Holesky - eth-clients/holesky#132
Hoodi - eth-clients/hoodi#21
Sepolia - eth-clients/sepolia#111

@eserilev eserilev added fulu Required for the upcoming Fulu hard fork v8.0.0-rc.0 Q3 2025 release for Fusaka on Holesky ready-for-review The code is ready for review labels Sep 25, 2025
Copy link
Member

@pawanjay176 pawanjay176 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have checked against the eth-clients config and all the fork epoch and bpo values match.

@jimmygchen jimmygchen added ready-for-merge This PR is ready to merge. and removed ready-for-review The code is ready for review labels Sep 26, 2025
@mergify mergify bot added the queued label Sep 26, 2025
mergify bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2025
Copy link
Member

@jimmygchen jimmygchen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @eserilev @pawanjay176
I've also triple-verified and good to go 👍

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 20c6ce4 into sigp:unstable Sep 26, 2025
37 checks passed
@mergify mergify bot removed the queued label Sep 26, 2025
lmnzx pushed a commit to lmnzx/lighthouse that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2025
Holesky - sigp#8096
Hoodi - sigp#8097
Sepolia - sigp#8099


  Testnet configs for Holesky, Hoodi and Sepolia

Holesky - eth-clients/holesky#132
Hoodi - eth-clients/hoodi#21
Sepolia - eth-clients/sepolia#111


Co-Authored-By: Eitan Seri- Levi <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

fulu Required for the upcoming Fulu hard fork ready-for-merge This PR is ready to merge. v8.0.0-rc.0 Q3 2025 release for Fusaka on Holesky

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants