-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 75
Update references.md #117
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update references.md #117
Conversation
typo ? Actually I am not sure that I understand this sentence; Could it be: > Even shell scripts are processed as external commands (and thus respecting shebang), so they are not covered by coverage. (if my understanding's right)
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #117 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 66.18% 66.18%
=======================================
Files 98 98
Lines 4267 4267
=======================================
Hits 2824 2824
Misses 1443 1443 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
docs/references.md
Outdated
| This is primarily designed for external command calls. | ||
| The external command does not have to be a shell script. | ||
| Even shell scripts are processed as external commands (respect shebang), so it not covered by coverage. | ||
| Even shell scripts are processed as external commands (respect shebang), so it is not covered by coverage. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| Even shell scripts are processed as external commands (respect shebang), so it is not covered by coverage. | |
| Even shell scripts are executed as external commands according to the shebang, so they are not covered by coverage. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(I added it if you want, or just close this PR, as you wish ;))
following @ko1nksm suggestion
|
Merged, thanks! |
typo ?
Actually I am not sure that I understand this sentence;
Could it be:
(if my understanding's right)