Skip to content

Conversation

@nfischer
Copy link
Member

No change to logic. I'm trying a minor change in order to test out codecov from within a fork. I want to see if codecov will upload using the CODECOV_TOKEN or not.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.28%. Comparing base (d81c325) to head (a49ef72).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1168   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.28%   97.28%           
=======================================
  Files          36       36           
  Lines        1361     1361           
=======================================
  Hits         1324     1324           
  Misses         37       37           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

No change to logic. I'm trying a minor change in order to test out
codecov from within a fork. I want to see if codecov will upload using
the CODECOV_TOKEN or not.
nfischer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 23, 2024
No change to logic. This updates codecov/codecov-action to v4. This
version supposedly has better support for external contributors working
from repository forks.

Tested this out with PR #1168.
@nfischer
Copy link
Member Author

Closing this in favor of PR #1167.

@nfischer nfischer closed this Jun 23, 2024
nfischer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 23, 2024
No change to logic. This updates codecov/codecov-action to v4. This
version supposedly has better support for external contributors working
from repository forks.

Tested this out with PR #1168.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant