Summary
The repo docs now frame React on Rails as one product with an OSS starting point and a Pro upgrade path. The public site still does not make that transition especially explicit on the homepage/docs entry flow.
What I verified
Homepage
I checked https://reactonrails.com/ on March 26, 2026 UTC.
- The homepage has strong getting-started and migration CTAs
- It does not appear to surface an explicit OSS-vs-Pro comparison or feature-matrix style decision point
- It links to
/docs/pro from the footer, but the homepage itself does not clearly explain when to stay OSS vs when to upgrade to Pro
Pro docs landing route
I checked https://reactonrails.com/docs/pro/.
- The route is live (
200)
- It is still rendering the legacy
pro/react-on-rails-pro content shape
- The page still includes old support-plan / email-first wording and does not present the concise modern upgrade story as clearly as the repo docs now do
Why this matters
- New users should encounter one product story: start with OSS, upgrade to Pro when you need RSC, streaming SSR, or higher SSR throughput
- The current site makes the docs more modern than the public marketing/docs entry flow
- This is the public-facing counterpart to the repo-side docs cleanup work
Related issues
Acceptance criteria
Summary
The repo docs now frame React on Rails as one product with an OSS starting point and a Pro upgrade path. The public site still does not make that transition especially explicit on the homepage/docs entry flow.
What I verified
Homepage
I checked
https://reactonrails.com/on March 26, 2026 UTC./docs/profrom the footer, but the homepage itself does not clearly explain when to stay OSS vs when to upgrade to ProPro docs landing route
I checked
https://reactonrails.com/docs/pro/.200)pro/react-on-rails-procontent shapeWhy this matters
Related issues
shakacode/react_on_rails#2838for the stalereact-on-rails-pro.mdsource page and referencespro.reactonrails.comdestinationAcceptance criteria
/docs/pro/presents the modern Pro story clearly: evaluation policy, who should upgrade, and the short upgrade path/docs/prodestination