Coverage remained the same at 82.449% when pulling 42f310b on alleycat-at-git:hotfix/assets_symlinks into 4f05cf4 on shakacode:master.

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r1.
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion.

lib/tasks/assets.rake, line 34 [r1] (raw file):

          next
        end
        manifest_path = manifest_glob.first

@alleycat-at-git If somebody upgraded, is it possible they could have both files? Seems that the code would get the first file, being the new format.

Comments from Reviewable

I'd day ready to release.

Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion.

Comments from Reviewable

Theoretically it could be, but the code will take the new format file and it will be right in this case

On 27 May 2016, at 10:05, Justin Gordon [email protected] wrote:

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r1.
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion.

lib/tasks/assets.rake, line 34 [r1](raw file):

      next
    end
    manifest_path = manifest_glob.first

@alleycat-at-git If somebody upgraded, is it possible they could have both files? Seems that the code would get the first file, being the new format.

Comments from Reviewable

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

@alleycat-at-git I'll take care of the CHANGELOG.md

Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion.

Comments from Reviewable

Fixed #435.