[WIP] Move asynchronous network loads to the fetch stack and remove unused code.#13714
[WIP] Move asynchronous network loads to the fetch stack and remove unused code.#13714
Conversation
|
Heads up! This PR modifies the following files:
|
|
I need spec links on each of the Reviewed 2 of 2 files at r1, 2 of 2 files at r2, 2 of 2 files at r3, 2 of 2 files at r4, 1 of 1 files at r5, 1 of 1 files at r6, 1 of 1 files at r7, 1 of 1 files at r8, 2 of 2 files at r9, 1 of 1 files at r10, 1 of 1 files at r11, 1 of 1 files at r12, 2 of 2 files at r13. components/net/image_cache_thread.rs, line 536 at r8 (raw file):
Do we need ResponseAction anymore? We can just proxy the FetchResponseMsg through components/net/image_cache_thread.rs, line 228 at r13 (raw file):
If we're not removing this, make this comment reflect what specifically this is used for here components/script/dom/servoparser/mod.rs, line 345 at r3 (raw file):
might be useful as a convenience method, Comments from Reviewable |
ac2bd28 to
8fbf382
Compare
|
@bors-servo r=Manishearth |
|
📌 Commit 8fbf382 has been approved by |
|
@bors-servo r- Apparently not |
|
@bors-servo r+ |
|
📌 Commit 8fbf382 has been approved by |
|
@bors-servo p=1 |
|
⌛ Testing commit 8fbf382 with merge 7c295d7... |
Move asynchronous network loads to the fetch stack and remove unused code. <!-- Reviewable:start --> This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/13714) <!-- Reviewable:end -->
|
💔 Test failed - linux-rel-wpt |
|
Looks like I'll need to support blob URLs. I'll check tomorrow if I can land some parts of this PR independently. |
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #13711) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
|
@bors-servo r+ |
|
Currently, this is hitting a timeout in I'll leave it to @jdm to decide whether that's a good idea. |
|
Perhaps it makes sense to open a tracking issue for this? |
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #13742) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
This matches the previous default (network.mime.sniff off) behaviour in all but one case: we will now accept a font without a `Content-Type` header, which would previously have been ignored.
|
I reviewed these commits by accident in #13961. |
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #13961) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
This change is