Add base definition of properties#8222
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #8222 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 88.10% 88.04% -0.06%
==========================================
Files 248 248
Lines 9384 9329 -55
==========================================
- Hits 8268 8214 -54
+ Misses 1116 1115 -1
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
@fredericbarthelet is this intentionally posted as draft pull request? |
|
@medikoo yes it is intentional, I'm not quite finished yet on this one :) Should be completed by the end of the day |
19a831a to
daefbee
Compare
|
@medikoo this PR is now ready for review when you can :) |
medikoo
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@fredericbarthelet great thanks for that!
In master I've reordered definitions so alphabetical order is respected, and I see now this branch conflicts due to that. Can you rebase it against master?
928e564 to
1397042
Compare
|
@medikoo I sorted the properties :) Let me know what you think |
medikoo
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@fredericbarthelet that looks outstanding! Great thanks for that. Please see my remarks, and let me know what you think
df10779 to
28bc5fa
Compare
|
@medikoo I took into account all of your comments. Could you have another look at my PR and let me know if something is still missing ? thanks :) |
34aef93 to
72211f7
Compare
medikoo
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks @fredericbarthelet it looks very good! We're nearly there, please see my comments
72211f7 to
eafcb91
Compare
|
@medikoo updated my PR with your latest comments :) |
eafcb91 to
17a4da7
Compare
medikoo
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@fredericbarthelet sorry for confusion. Tests exposed that actually package.individually is supported on function level (my bad - I totally forgot it's the case).
In light of that, we need to recognize that option on function level
17a4da7 to
9e25629
Compare
|
@medikoo no problem, updated it with allowed |
medikoo
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@fredericbarthelet that looks great!
I have just last few minor (totally nit picking) style suggestions, so we're noise free and consistent. Let me know
|
@medikoo no problem, updated to match alphabetical order and removed unecessary |
medikoo
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you @fredericbarthelet !
Closes: #8017
Addresses: #8016