You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for the reply, following up with some observations.
Looking at the Xenium reader source code, for Xenium versions > 2.0.0, morphology_mip.ome.tif is no longer consumed. Only images under morphology_focus/ are parsed into the SpatialData object, and the full Z-stack morphology.ome.tif is not used. Is this the intended behavior?
For the dataset I'm using, the "analysis_sw_version": "R&D" specification in the experiment.xenium file is not recognized by the parser. This triggers the < 2.0.0 code path, causing the reader to look for the morphology_mip.ome.tif file that does not exist. The root cause appears to be the same as issue #361.
Activity
LucaMarconato commentedon Feb 1, 2026
Thanks for reporting, I suggest to make a symlink for the expected file name. A fix in
xenium()would be to look also for the alternative file name.enric-bazz commentedon Feb 2, 2026
Thanks for the reply, following up with some observations.
Looking at the Xenium reader source code, for Xenium versions > 2.0.0,
morphology_mip.ome.tifis no longer consumed. Only images undermorphology_focus/are parsed into theSpatialDataobject, and the full Z-stackmorphology.ome.tifis not used. Is this the intended behavior?For the dataset I'm using, the
"analysis_sw_version": "R&D"specification in theexperiment.xeniumfile is not recognized by the parser. This triggers the< 2.0.0code path, causing the reader to look for themorphology_mip.ome.tiffile that does not exist. The root cause appears to be the same as issue #361.