Skip to content

Conversation

@GaelVaroquaux
Copy link
Member

Document better the inclusion criteria for new algorithm to speed up an existing problem.

Summarizes discussion at the sprint with @jnothman @adrinjalali @ogrisel and others.

Document better the inclusion criteria for new algorithm to speed up an
existing problem.
doc/faq.rst Outdated
- It does not introduce new hyper-parameters (as it makes the library
more future-proof)
- It is easy to document clearly when the contribution improves the speed
and when it does not.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this second point might benefit from an example "(e.g. when n_features >> n_samples)"

might want periods at the end of every list item for consistency

doc/faq.rst Outdated
more future-proof),
- it is easy to document clearly when the contribution improves the speed
and when it does not, for instance "when n_features >>
n_samples)",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks! seems like there's a spurious parenthesis, otherwise lgtm

@jnothman
Copy link
Member

Let's merge

@jnothman jnothman merged commit a222ba7 into scikit-learn:master Feb 25, 2019
xhluca pushed a commit to xhluca/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2019
xhluca pushed a commit to xhluca/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2019
xhluca pushed a commit to xhluca/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2019
koenvandevelde pushed a commit to koenvandevelde/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants