chore(ci): remove Travis CI#309
Merged
thewtex merged 1 commit intoscikit-build:masterfrom Nov 7, 2022
Merged
Conversation
We've been out of credits for 8 months with no builds triggered on Travis CI. This leaves PR untested for alternative architectures (well, they've been untested for 8 months already). We can just rely on GHA scheduled builds for those architectures. Tags are also built using GHA for those architectures.
Member
Promising news! |
thewtex
approved these changes
Nov 7, 2022
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We've been out of credits for 8 months with no builds triggered on Travis CI.
This leaves PR untested for alternative architectures (well, they've been untested for 8 months already).
We can just rely on GHA scheduled builds for those architectures.
Tags are also built using GHA for those architectures.
We'll be able to add aarch64 to PR workflows once GHA adds support for aarch64. Hopefully, it will be solved faster than the macOS arm64 issue (which is still opened).