Skip to content

Consider renaming generic types and properties #417

@vickitardif

Description

@vickitardif

As schema.org grows, generic names for types and properties leads to unfortunate collisions. The issue will become more problematic when extensions are made a part of the flat namespace.

I am opening this issue as a place to gather ideas for types and properties which should be considered for renaming:

Types

  • Series
  • Season
  • Seat
  • Taxi
  • Joint
  • Vessel
  • Artery
  • Diet
  • Code
  • AlignmentObject
  • Audience
  • Permit
  • Ticket

Properties

  • affectedBy
  • algorithm
  • alignmentType
  • antagonist
  • application
  • area
  • aspect
  • assembly
  • audience
  • background
  • benefits
  • branch
  • branchOf
  • carrier
  • catalog
  • code
  • collection
  • configuration
  • comment
  • cost
  • course
  • damages
  • device
  • diet
  • doors
  • engine
  • episode
  • event
  • followup
  • free
  • frequency
  • function
  • functionalClass
  • gears
  • guideline
  • incentives
  • indication
  • instrument
  • intensity
  • material
  • menu
  • object
  • option
  • origin
  • outcome
  • overview
  • phase
  • playerType
  • population
  • position
  • preparation
  • procedure
  • producer
  • produces
  • purpose
  • requirements
  • responsibilities
  • result
  • risks
  • season
  • significance
  • skills
  • source
  • specialty
  • stage
  • status
  • study
  • subtype
  • surface
  • target
  • temporal
  • text
  • timezone
  • title
  • transmission
  • tributary
  • workLoad

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

schema.org vocabGeneral top level tag for issues on the vocabularystatus:work expectedWe are likely to, or would like to, or probably should try, ... to do something in this area.type:cleanup + clarityAddresses wording fixes, ambiguities, confusion, bad examples etctype:tricky problemHard problems, including modeling / vocabulary and infrastructural aspects (eg fiction, probability)

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions