Add py.typed for proper typechecking support on clients#513
Merged
Conversation
saiatmakuri
approved these changes
May 7, 2024
yunfeng-scale
suggested changes
May 7, 2024
Contributor
yunfeng-scale
left a comment
yunfeng-scale
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
updating this version is not enough. there are two other places to update
seanshi-scale
approved these changes
May 7, 2024
yunfeng-scale
approved these changes
May 7, 2024
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull Request Summary
What is this PR changing? Why is this change being made? Any caveats you'd like to highlight? Link any relevant documents, links, or screenshots here if applicable.
Make the published client PEP 561 compatible so that downstream users can get type hinting
Test Plan and Usage Guide
How did you validate that your PR works correctly? How do you run or demo the code? Provide enough detail so a reviewer can reasonably reproduce the testing procedure. Paste example command line invocations if applicable.