Skip to content

Conversation

@tgodzik
Copy link
Contributor

@tgodzik tgodzik commented Dec 11, 2025

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 11, 2025

Dependency Review

The following issues were found:
  • ❌ 5 vulnerable package(s)
  • ✅ 0 package(s) with incompatible licenses
  • ✅ 0 package(s) with invalid SPDX license definitions
  • ✅ 0 package(s) with unknown licenses.
See the Details below.

Vulnerabilities

sbt-plugin/build.sbt

NameVersionVulnerabilitySeverity
com.squareup.okhttp3:okhttp3.14.2Square OkHttp can accept the wrong certificatehigh
com.squareup.okio:okio1.17.2Okio Signed to Unsigned Conversion Error vulnerabilitymoderate
org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core2.17.0Improper Input Validation and Injection in Apache Log4j2moderate
org.scala-sbt:io_2.121.5.1sbt vulnerable to arbitrary file write via archive extraction (Zip Slip)low
org.scala-sbt:sbt1.5.8sbt vulnerable to arbitrary file write via archive extraction (Zip Slip)low

Scanned Manifest Files

sbt-plugin/build.sbt

@tgodzik tgodzik merged commit 768f9b6 into main Dec 11, 2025
7 of 8 checks passed
@tgodzik tgodzik deleted the fix-release branch December 11, 2025 16:07
@mkurz
Copy link
Contributor

mkurz commented Dec 11, 2025

@tgodzik Can you please force push the v3 tag so it points to 768f9b6 - just like v3.2.0?
Reason is because we use scalacenter/sbt-dependency-submission@v3 in our workflows.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants