Skip to content

Commit 8194c66

Browse files
authored
Bug fix for configuration option INTEL:HSW/BDW (wrf-model#1645)
TYPE: bug fix KEYWORDS: Intel, ifort, HWS, BDW, bug SOURCE: GitHub user jw500 DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES: Problem: When a user chooses one of the following configuration options for the Intel (HWS/BDW) compiler, `64. (serial) 65. (smpar) 66. (dmpar) 67. (dm+sm) INTEL (ifort/icc): HSW/BDW` they will instead be given a configuration for the corresponding option for basic Intel. `13. (serial) 14. (smpar) 15. (dmpar) 16. (dm+sm) INTEL (ifort/icc)` The configure.wrf file will read ``` #### Architecture specific settings #### # Settings for Linux x86_64 ppc64le i486 i586 i686, ifort compiler with icc (serial) DESCRIPTION = INTEL ($SFC/$SCC) ``` This is the result of "Add missing compiler name for two Intel config stanzas" wrf-model#1326, hash [commit 0a9c2eb](wrf-model@0a9c2eb) Solution: Modified configure.defaults to ensure the "#ARCH" lines were not identical between HSW/BDW Intel and basic Intel options. LIST OF MODIFIED FILES: M arch/configure.defaults TESTS CONDUCTED: 1. Mods fix the issue. A configuration was done to test this. 2. Jenkins tests are all passing. RELEASE NOTE: Beginning with V4.2.2 a bug was introduced that prevented users from configuring the model with the "INTEL (ifort/icc): HSW/BDW" option. This is now resolved.
1 parent 16c9287 commit 8194c66

File tree

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

arch/configure.defaults

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1834,7 +1834,7 @@ RLFLAGS =
18341834
CC_TOOLS = $(SCC)
18351835

18361836
###########################################################
1837-
#ARCH Linux x86_64 ppc64le i486 i586 i686, ifort compiler with icc #serial smpar dmpar dm+sm
1837+
#ARCH Linux HSW/BDW x86_64 ppc64le i486 i586 i686, ifort compiler with icc #serial smpar dmpar dm+sm
18381838
#
18391839
DESCRIPTION = INTEL ($SFC/$SCC): HSW/BDW
18401840
DMPARALLEL = # 1

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)