Skip to content

Conversation

@viktorklang
Copy link
Contributor

@viktorklang viktorklang commented Oct 29, 2020

Introduces ExecutionContext.opportunistic as a private[scala] instance as an escape-hatch for getting the original 2.13.0 batching global EC

@viktorklang viktorklang added this to the 2.13.4 milestone Oct 29, 2020
@viktorklang viktorklang requested review from dwijnand and lrytz October 29, 2020 21:14
Copy link
Member

@dwijnand dwijnand left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, Viktor!

@viktorklang viktorklang force-pushed the wip-opportunistic-√ branch from 48bd47a to 832b3ef Compare October 29, 2020 22:46
@viktorklang
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dwijnand You're most welcome! I added a MIMA exception since that errored out the build. Waiting for build confirmation of success.

@lrytz lrytz force-pushed the wip-opportunistic-√ branch 3 times, most recently from e433454 to 39edf7e Compare November 9, 2020 12:55
@lrytz
Copy link
Member

lrytz commented Nov 9, 2020

@viktorklang I changed the field to a lazy val and added a second commit with changes to Scaladocs. Let me know what you think.

@lrytz lrytz force-pushed the wip-opportunistic-√ branch from 39edf7e to ffb55ae Compare November 9, 2020 13:01
…e as an escape-hatch for getting the original 2.13.0 batching global EC
@lrytz lrytz force-pushed the wip-opportunistic-√ branch from ffb55ae to 48c5232 Compare November 9, 2020 14:34
@dwijnand dwijnand mentioned this pull request Nov 10, 2020
72 tasks
@dwijnand dwijnand added the release-notes worth highlighting in next release notes label Nov 10, 2020
@dwijnand dwijnand changed the title Introduces ExecutionContext.opportunistic as a private[scala] instanc… Introduce ExecutionContext.opportunistic for use in apps Nov 10, 2020
@lrytz lrytz force-pushed the wip-opportunistic-√ branch from 48c5232 to 618b63d Compare November 11, 2020 15:13
@lrytz
Copy link
Member

lrytz commented Nov 11, 2020

@viktorklang updated - lgty now?

@viktorklang
Copy link
Contributor Author

@lrytz LGTM

@lrytz
Copy link
Member

lrytz commented Nov 12, 2020

There is a remaining issue: private[x] members are skipped by scaladoc unless it runs with -private, which we don't for the library. So noone is going to be able to see these docs that we wrote 😕

Should we move/copy the documentation for opportunistic to global? Other suggestions?

@dwijnand
Copy link
Member

I'd say move and point opportunistic's docs to it.

@viktorklang
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dwijnand @lrytz Dale's suggestion looks sound to me.

@lrytz lrytz force-pushed the wip-opportunistic-√ branch from 618b63d to 0044904 Compare November 13, 2020 08:16
@lrytz lrytz merged commit 1df410a into scala:2.13.x Nov 13, 2020
hamzaremmal pushed a commit to hamzaremmal/scala3 that referenced this pull request May 2, 2025
hamzaremmal pushed a commit to scala/scala3 that referenced this pull request May 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

release-notes worth highlighting in next release notes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants