Skip to content

Conversation

@Ichoran
Copy link
Contributor

@Ichoran Ichoran commented Jan 22, 2019

Doesn't address the difficult issue of what the "natural" behavior is for
BigDecimal. Instead, it just takes the precision it's given and throws
an exception if the step size cannot be represented without loss.

@scala-jenkins scala-jenkins added this to the 2.13.0-RC1 milestone Jan 22, 2019
@Ichoran Ichoran requested review from NthPortal and xuwei-k January 22, 2019 00:22
@Ichoran
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ichoran commented Jan 22, 2019

Fixes scala/bug#11152, alternative to #7516 that doesn't reintroduce old bugs

@sjrd sjrd mentioned this pull request Jan 30, 2019
51 tasks
@adriaanm
Copy link
Contributor

adriaanm commented Feb 4, 2019

Sounds like this is ready to merge?

@Ichoran
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ichoran commented Feb 4, 2019

@adriaanm - I still need to fix the test to test something.

@SethTisue SethTisue removed their assignment Mar 4, 2019
@adriaanm
Copy link
Contributor

adriaanm commented Mar 5, 2019

Ping @Ichoran

@Ichoran
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ichoran commented Mar 5, 2019

Oops. I'll get to it tonight or tomorrow.

@Ichoran
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ichoran commented Mar 7, 2019

...or not. Definitely during the weekend; maybe Friday evening, but since I'm in California I don't expect there will be any practical difference.

Doesn't address the difficult issue of what the "natural" behavior is for
BigDecimal.  Instead, it just takes the precision it's given and throws
an exception if the step size cannot be represented without loss.

Tests for appropriate behavior are included.
@Ichoran
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ichoran commented Mar 9, 2019

@adriaanm - All ready now, assuming the tests pass. (They pass locally.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants