-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 85
update formula with map.jinja and style guide references, improve REA… #20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update formula with map.jinja and style guide references, improve REA… #20
Conversation
| @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ | |||
| # should contain the currently released version of the formula | |||
| 1.0.0 | |||
| 0.1.0 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
0.1.1 to match the value in CHANGELOG.rst.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah but I need to have a commit hash to make a tag.. I think........
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But when this is merged, it will be v0.1.1.
| @@ -1,6 +1,31 @@ | |||
| template formula | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Excellent, tagging releases has already started! May I recommend standardising our changelogs according to the format set out at https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I pushed the tags myself. :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thats on the todo list...I hope....
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@aboe76 Yes, I've already pulled and appreciated the tags in gitk! Looks great, thanks for running with that.
* Fix 5dc0b86 in saltstack-formulas#95 - No option `merge=True` for `config.get` * Use `pillar.get` for `salt-call` (i.e. `salt-ssh`) * Use `config.get` via. `defaults.merge` otherwise - Reintroduce based on 775a930 in saltstack-formulas#20
* Fix 5dc0b86 in saltstack-formulas#95 - No option `merge=True` for `config.get` * Use `pillar.get` for `salt-call` (i.e. `salt-ssh`) * Use `config.get` via. `defaults.merge` otherwise - Reintroduce based on 775a930 in saltstack-formulas#20
* Fix 5dc0b86 in saltstack-formulas#95 - No option `merge=True` for `config.get` * Use `pillar.get` for `salt-call` (i.e. `salt-ssh`) - Differentiate `salt-ssh`/`salt-call` via. `root_dir` * Use `config.get` via. `defaults.merge` otherwise - Reintroduce based on 775a930 in saltstack-formulas#20
* Fix 5dc0b86 in saltstack-formulas#95 - No option `merge=True` for `config.get` * Use `pillar.get` for `salt-call` (i.e. `salt-ssh`) - Differentiate `salt-ssh`/`salt-call` via. `root_dir` * Use `config.get` via. `defaults.merge` otherwise - Reintroduce based on 775a930 in saltstack-formulas#20
Update map.jinja with better merging.
Update README for style guide references
Updated VERSION and CHANGELOG file