-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 317
Fix for usage not updating in live block view #168
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughA single line was added to the main live monitoring loop in the Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @dalmia007, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request addresses a bug in the live block view where usage information was not updating dynamically. The change ensures that the monitoring system's cache is cleared before each refresh cycle, guaranteeing that the displayed usage data is always current.
Highlights
- Live Monitoring Fix: Implemented
monitor.clearCache()within thestartLiveMonitoringloop insrc/commands/_blocks.live.tsto resolve an issue where usage data was not updating in the live block view.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
commit: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request aims to fix an issue where the live block view was not updating. The change involves clearing the live monitor's cache on every refresh cycle. While this likely resolves the immediate problem, it introduces a significant performance regression by disabling the incremental data loading mechanism. My review focuses on this performance concern and recommends addressing the root cause of the update issue instead.
| while (!abortController.signal.aborted) { | ||
| // Get active block with lightweight refresh | ||
| const activeBlock = await monitor.getActiveBlock(); | ||
| monitor.clearCache(); // Force reload for next refresh |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Calling monitor.clearCache() on every iteration of the monitoring loop defeats the purpose of the LiveMonitor class, which is designed for efficient, incremental data loading.
As per its implementation in src/_live-monitor.ts, LiveMonitor caches file timestamps and processed entries to avoid re-reading and re-processing all usage data on every refresh. By clearing the cache, you are forcing a full reload of all data files on every cycle. This can lead to significant performance issues, especially with a large amount of historical usage data, due to unnecessary file I/O and JSON parsing.
While this might fix the issue of usage not updating, it's a brute-force solution. The root cause is likely a bug in the incremental loading logic within LiveMonitor.getActiveBlock() that prevents it from detecting new or updated usage entries correctly. It would be better to investigate and fix that underlying issue rather than disabling the caching mechanism.
I recommend removing this line and debugging the incremental update logic.
|
Ok so let's try it and see the result. |
|
Yes. I have tested it and its working fine. However, the logic can be improved |
Related to #164
Summary by CodeRabbit