Skip to content

Conversation

@dalmia007
Copy link
Contributor

@dalmia007 dalmia007 commented Jun 22, 2025

Related to #164

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved live monitoring to ensure data is always refreshed for each update cycle.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 22, 2025

Walkthrough

A single line was added to the main live monitoring loop in the startLiveMonitoring function, ensuring that the monitor's cache is cleared after retrieving the active block. This change enforces a fresh data reload for each refresh cycle. No other logic or exported entity signatures were modified.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/commands/_blocks.live.ts Added monitor.clearCache() in the live monitoring loop to force cache refresh after retrieving the active block.

Poem

In the loop where blocks are spied,
A cache is cleared, no secrets to hide.
Each cycle anew, fresh data appears,
The rabbit observes with attentive ears.
Live updates now hop with glee—
A cleaner view for all to see! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2d862da and df279de.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/commands/_blocks.live.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/commands/_blocks.live.ts (1)

98-98: LGTM! This correctly fixes the stale data issue in live monitoring.

The cache clear ensures that each refresh cycle retrieves fresh usage data rather than serving stale cached results. The placement is optimal - after consuming the current data but before the next refresh cycle begins.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @dalmia007, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a bug in the live block view where usage information was not updating dynamically. The change ensures that the monitoring system's cache is cleared before each refresh cycle, guaranteeing that the displayed usage data is always current.

Highlights

  • Live Monitoring Fix: Implemented monitor.clearCache() within the startLiveMonitoring loop in src/commands/_blocks.live.ts to resolve an issue where usage data was not updating in the live block view.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@pkg-pr-new
Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Jun 22, 2025

Open in StackBlitz

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/ryoppippi/ccusage@168

commit: df279de

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request aims to fix an issue where the live block view was not updating. The change involves clearing the live monitor's cache on every refresh cycle. While this likely resolves the immediate problem, it introduces a significant performance regression by disabling the incremental data loading mechanism. My review focuses on this performance concern and recommends addressing the root cause of the update issue instead.

while (!abortController.signal.aborted) {
// Get active block with lightweight refresh
const activeBlock = await monitor.getActiveBlock();
monitor.clearCache(); // Force reload for next refresh
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

Calling monitor.clearCache() on every iteration of the monitoring loop defeats the purpose of the LiveMonitor class, which is designed for efficient, incremental data loading.

As per its implementation in src/_live-monitor.ts, LiveMonitor caches file timestamps and processed entries to avoid re-reading and re-processing all usage data on every refresh. By clearing the cache, you are forcing a full reload of all data files on every cycle. This can lead to significant performance issues, especially with a large amount of historical usage data, due to unnecessary file I/O and JSON parsing.

While this might fix the issue of usage not updating, it's a brute-force solution. The root cause is likely a bug in the incremental loading logic within LiveMonitor.getActiveBlock() that prevents it from detecting new or updated usage entries correctly. It would be better to investigate and fix that underlying issue rather than disabling the caching mechanism.

I recommend removing this line and debugging the incremental update logic.

@ryoppippi
Copy link
Owner

Ok so let's try it and see the result.
and let's debug the logic later

@ryoppippi ryoppippi merged commit 697487c into ryoppippi:main Jun 22, 2025
7 checks passed
@dalmia007
Copy link
Contributor Author

dalmia007 commented Jun 22, 2025

Yes. I have tested it and its working fine. However, the logic can be improved

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants