Skip to content

Conversation

@s-heppner
Copy link

No description provided.

@s-heppner s-heppner merged commit 151e8a4 into BaSyxCore/main Feb 1, 2024
@s-heppner s-heppner deleted the BaSyxCore/ScriptRefactor branch February 1, 2024 08:38
Frosty2500 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2024
…sitory

Previously, we used the `rwth-iat` fork to pull the SDK from,
inside the docker file, due to the fact, that the `eclipse-basyx`
repository, did not contain the necessary branch.
Now that this is the case, it makes sense to always use the
official repository.

This also fixes the dependency issues of missing dependencies, as
they have been fixed in the main repository.

Fix #8
Fix #9
s-heppner added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2024
…sitory

Previously, we used the `rwth-iat` fork to pull the SDK from,
inside the docker file, due to the fact, that the `eclipse-basyx`
repository, did not contain the necessary branch.
Now that this is the case, it makes sense to always use the
official repository.

This also fixes the dependency issues of missing dependencies, as
they have been fixed in the main repository.

Fix #8
Fix #9
Ornella33 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2025
…sitory

Previously, we used the `rwth-iat` fork to pull the SDK from,
inside the docker file, due to the fact, that the `eclipse-basyx`
repository, did not contain the necessary branch.
Now that this is the case, it makes sense to always use the
official repository.

This also fixes the dependency issues of missing dependencies, as
they have been fixed in the main repository.

Fix #8
Fix #9
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants