Skip to content

Conversation

@llogiq
Copy link
Contributor

@llogiq llogiq commented Oct 1, 2022

This fixes #8961 by moving the lint into the docs code, thus being able to re-use the pulldown-cmark parser and simplifying the code.


changelog: none

@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @Alexendoo

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Oct 1, 2022
@llogiq
Copy link
Contributor Author

llogiq commented Oct 1, 2022

Oops, it fails dogfood. I'll fix it after lunch.

@llogiq llogiq force-pushed the doc-link-with-code branch from 6af5f06 to 3757a0e Compare October 1, 2022 13:25
@llogiq
Copy link
Contributor Author

llogiq commented Oct 1, 2022

Done. r?

@Alexendoo
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 1, 2022

📌 Commit 3757a0e has been approved by Alexendoo

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 1, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 3757a0e with merge 8da2429...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 1, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: Alexendoo
Pushing 8da2429 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 8da2429 into master Oct 1, 2022
@llogiq llogiq deleted the doc-link-with-code branch October 1, 2022 15:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

doc_link_with_quotes false postive for code inside code block

4 participants