Skip to content

Conversation

@giraffate
Copy link
Contributor

Fix #6870. It's because this doc lacks the description that this lint is also used for Option.

changelog: none

@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @llogiq

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Mar 9, 2021
@flip1995
Copy link
Member

flip1995 commented Mar 9, 2021

@bors r+

Thanks!

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 9, 2021

📌 Commit e0f982b has been approved by flip1995

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 9, 2021

⌛ Testing commit e0f982b with merge 2b781c9...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 9, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: flip1995
Pushing 2b781c9 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 2b781c9 into rust-lang:master Mar 9, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Suggest replacing .map(f).flatten() with .and_then(f) on Options

5 participants