Skip to content

Conversation

@ChayimFriedman2
Copy link
Contributor

I didn't follow rustc precisely, because I think it does some things wrongly (or they are FIXME), but I only allowed more code, not less. So we're all fine.

Closes #18145.

I didn't follow rustc precisely, because I think it does some things wrongly (or they are FIXME), but I only allowed more code, not less. So we're all fine.
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 19, 2024
@Veykril
Copy link
Member

Veykril commented Sep 20, 2024

Thanks!
@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 20, 2024

📌 Commit 8a50aec has been approved by Veykril

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 20, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 8a50aec with merge d4689f1...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 20, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Veykril
Pushing d4689f1 to master...

@bors bors merged commit d4689f1 into rust-lang:master Sep 20, 2024
@ChayimFriedman2 ChayimFriedman2 deleted the metavar-concat branch October 6, 2024 22:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add support for macro_metavar_expr_concat

4 participants