Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated E0527 to new error format #36121

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 7, 2016
Merged

Updated E0527 to new error format #36121

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 7, 2016

Conversation

Cobrand
Copy link
Contributor

@Cobrand Cobrand commented Aug 29, 2016

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @nikomatsakis (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@Cobrand
Copy link
Contributor Author

Cobrand commented Aug 30, 2016

@jonathandturner I didn't notice we could pick an assignee when starting a PR ; just for future notice is there an way to change the assignee after a pull request has been opened ?

The Travis check is failing but I'm not sure it comes from my code.

Also, I didn't have to change any test (they were all working even after the changes), but should I update at least the E0527.rs so it fits exactly the error message ?

@sophiajt
Copy link
Contributor

@Cobrand - you can use the same r? but as a new comment. Like this:

r? @jonathandturner

@sophiajt
Copy link
Contributor

@Cobrand - you may also want to talk with @ashrko619, since they signed up for E0527 (see #35233 for the list)

@Cobrand
Copy link
Contributor Author

Cobrand commented Aug 30, 2016

@ashrko619 Sorry it was my bad, I didn't see you had to answer the main thread to solve the issue, I just saw it undone and decided to do a PR. Would you mind passing this to me since I have already a PR done or do you have something ready already ?

@ashrwin
Copy link

ashrwin commented Aug 31, 2016

@Cobrand @jonathandturner No issues. I haven't yet started working on it :)

@sophiajt
Copy link
Contributor

Sounds good. @Cobrand - I'll update this one to point to you

@sophiajt
Copy link
Contributor

Alright, now to review...

@Cobrand - looks like it's a good start. The next thing to do is to make sure that the unit tests are updated to test for this new label. You can read how to do this in the Extra Credit section of the blog post. There's a quirk of the unit test system that means you'll need a NOTE before it will test the for the labels.

@sophiajt
Copy link
Contributor

sophiajt commented Sep 5, 2016

@Cobrand - looks like this one is getting close. When you're ready, squash the 3 commits down to 1 and ping me and I'll review.

@Cobrand
Copy link
Contributor Author

Cobrand commented Sep 5, 2016

@jonathandturner it should be fine now.

@sophiajt
Copy link
Contributor

sophiajt commented Sep 5, 2016

Great.

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 5, 2016

📌 Commit e8c5dc4 has been approved by jonathandturner

sophiajt pushed a commit to sophiajt/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2016
sophiajt pushed a commit to sophiajt/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2016
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2016
Rollup of 8 pull requests

- Successful merges: #36121, #36128, #36241, #36243, #36263, #36267, #36273, #36298
- Failed merges:
@bors bors merged commit e8c5dc4 into rust-lang:master Sep 7, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants