Skip to content

Conversation

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

The LLVM change 1 in #32239 unfortunately broke the LLVM build on MinGW, so
this LLVM submodule update brings in one more fix 2 which should hopefully
remedy that.

Once this lands we should be able to immediately start gating on this to prevent
it from happening again.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @brson

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@brson
Copy link
Contributor

brson commented Mar 15, 2016

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 15, 2016

📌 Commit 9452bf9 has been approved by brson

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r- gonna include a commit from @dotdash as well

The LLVM change [1] in rust-lang#32239 unfortunately broke the LLVM build on MinGW, so
this LLVM submodule update brings in one more fix [2] which should hopefully
remedy that.

Once this lands we should be able to immediately start gating on this to prevent
it from happening again.

[1]: rust-lang/llvm@be89e4b5
[2]: rust-lang/llvm@3dcd2c84
@alexcrichton alexcrichton force-pushed the fix-mingw-rustbuild-again branch from 9452bf9 to 41e184c Compare March 15, 2016 21:08
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r=brson 41e184c

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 16, 2016

⌛ Testing commit 41e184c with merge 3317cc9...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2016
rustbuild: Fix LLVM compile on MinGW

The LLVM change [1] in #32239 unfortunately broke the LLVM build on MinGW, so
this LLVM submodule update brings in one more fix [2] which should hopefully
remedy that.

Once this lands we should be able to immediately start gating on this to prevent
it from happening again.

[1]: rust-lang/llvm@be89e4b5
[2]: rust-lang/llvm@3dcd2c84
@bors bors merged commit 41e184c into rust-lang:master Mar 16, 2016
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the fix-mingw-rustbuild-again branch March 27, 2016 17:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants