Fix private fields diagnostics and improve error messages#154867
Merged
rust-bors[bot] merged 1 commit intorust-lang:mainfrom Apr 8, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Collaborator
|
rustbot has assigned @dingxiangfei2009. Use Why was this reviewer chosen?The reviewer was selected based on:
|
Member
|
@bors r+ rollup |
Contributor
rust-bors Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 8, 2026
…uwer Rollup of 15 pull requests Successful merges: - #153995 (Use convergent attribute to funcs for GPU targets) - #154184 (stabilize s390x vector registers) - #151898 (constify DoubleEndedIterator) - #154235 (remove unnecessary variables and delimiter check) - #154473 (move borrow checker tests) - #154745 (Replace span_look_ahead with span_followed_by) - #154778 (make field representing types invariant over the base type) - #154867 (Fix private fields diagnostics and improve error messages) - #154879 (Don't store `pattern_ty` in `TestableCase`) - #154910 (Suppress `unreachable_code` lint in `derive(PartialEq, Clone)`) - #154923 (Fix ICE in next-solver dyn-compatibility check) - #154934 (Add getters for `rustc_pattern_analysis::constructor::Slice` fields) - #154938 (match exhaustiveness: Show the guard exhaustivity note only when it's the guards alone that cause non-exhaustiveness) - #154961 (Use derived impl for `GappedRange` subdiagnostic) - #154980 (rustc-dev-guide subtree update)
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 8, 2026
Rollup merge of #154867 - chenyukang:yukang-fix-151408-private-fields-diagnostic, r=Kivooeo Fix private fields diagnostics and improve error messages Fixes #151408 while the best solution may be check whether the code is under user's control, e.g. in the same workspace. but if user does not provide some fields, mention other private fields seems weird, see the test case: ```console LL | let _ = std::collections::HashMap {}; | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | = note: private field `base` that was not provided ``` since we already suggested to use associated function to construct, it's better to remove the note. this fix only provide note on private fields when `did.is_local()` or user have already provide some fields.
github-actions Bot
pushed a commit
to rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 13, 2026
…uwer Rollup of 15 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#153995 (Use convergent attribute to funcs for GPU targets) - rust-lang/rust#154184 (stabilize s390x vector registers) - rust-lang/rust#151898 (constify DoubleEndedIterator) - rust-lang/rust#154235 (remove unnecessary variables and delimiter check) - rust-lang/rust#154473 (move borrow checker tests) - rust-lang/rust#154745 (Replace span_look_ahead with span_followed_by) - rust-lang/rust#154778 (make field representing types invariant over the base type) - rust-lang/rust#154867 (Fix private fields diagnostics and improve error messages) - rust-lang/rust#154879 (Don't store `pattern_ty` in `TestableCase`) - rust-lang/rust#154910 (Suppress `unreachable_code` lint in `derive(PartialEq, Clone)`) - rust-lang/rust#154923 (Fix ICE in next-solver dyn-compatibility check) - rust-lang/rust#154934 (Add getters for `rustc_pattern_analysis::constructor::Slice` fields) - rust-lang/rust#154938 (match exhaustiveness: Show the guard exhaustivity note only when it's the guards alone that cause non-exhaustiveness) - rust-lang/rust#154961 (Use derived impl for `GappedRange` subdiagnostic) - rust-lang/rust#154980 (rustc-dev-guide subtree update)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #151408
while the best solution may be check whether the code is under user's control, e.g. in the same workspace. but if user does not provide some fields, mention other private fields seems weird, see the test case:
since we already suggested to use associated function to construct, it's better to remove the note.
this fix only provide note on private fields when
did.is_local()or user have already provide some fields.