CI: use a native arm64 runner#126113
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Collaborator
|
rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum. Use |
rustbot
added
A-testsuite
Member
|
but what will I do with myself when PRs don't need to be babysat through periodic network fritzes and interruptions due to the spot-priced CI runner being reclaimed anymore? |
Member
Author
|
@bors try (Don't worry, the ARM runners are still in beta, so chances are that they will still need some babysitting :) ) |
Collaborator
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2024
[WIP] CI: use a native `arm64` runner Opening as a draft to test if we can use a native GitHub ARM runner instead of the self-hosted one. try-job: aarch64-gnu
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Collaborator
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
Member
Author
|
@bors try |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2024
[WIP] CI: use a native `arm64` runner Opening as a draft to test if we can use a native GitHub ARM runner instead of the self-hosted one. try-job: aarch64-gnu
Collaborator
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Collaborator
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
Member
Author
|
@bors try |
Collaborator
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2024
[WIP] CI: use a native `arm64` runner Opening as a draft to test if we can use a native GitHub ARM runner instead of the self-hosted one. try-job: aarch64-gnu
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This was referenced Jun 7, 2024
Kobzol
changed the title
arm64 runnerarm64 runner
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 8, 2024
CI: remove `Setup Python` action This action was added recently in rust-lang#125590, but it shouldn't really be needed, as our CI was working fine before without it. Our base Ubuntu 20.04 images use Python 3.8, while this action installed Python 3.12, but we don't really need that. Since this action does not support ARM yet, this blocks rust-lang#126113. See rust-lang#125590 (comment). r? `@jdno`
Kobzol
force-pushed
the
ci-native-arm-runner
branch
from
b1d3f4d to
f976a9b
Compare
Member
Author
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Member
Author
|
@bors try |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 10, 2024
CI: use a native `arm64` runner Opening to test if we can use a native GitHub ARM runner instead of the self-hosted one. The CI has finished [successfully](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/actions/runs/9414573751/job/25933776975?pr=126113). It took 1h 29m, which is longer than the previous duration (~1h 10m). This is expected, since we currently use 8 cores on GitHub, rather than 14 cores which are configured for the self-hosted runner. try-job: aarch64-gnu
Collaborator
Collaborator
|
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
Member
|
@bors r+ rollup=never |
Collaborator
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Collaborator
Collaborator
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Collaborator
|
Finished benchmarking commit (aec67e2): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. CyclesResults (secondary 6.1%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 675.712s -> 677.913s (0.33%) |
flip1995
pushed a commit
to flip1995/rust-clippy
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 28, 2024
CI: remove `Setup Python` action This action was added recently in rust-lang/rust#125590, but it shouldn't really be needed, as our CI was working fine before without it. Our base Ubuntu 20.04 images use Python 3.8, while this action installed Python 3.12, but we don't really need that. Since this action does not support ARM yet, this blocks rust-lang/rust#126113. See rust-lang/rust#125590 (comment). r? `@jdno`
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
8 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Opening to test if we can use a native GitHub ARM runner instead of the self-hosted one.
The CI has finished successfully. It took 1h 29m, which is longer than the previous duration (~1h 10m). This is expected, since we currently use 8 cores on GitHub, rather than 14 cores which are configured for the self-hosted runner.
try-job: aarch64-gnu