Skip to content

Conversation

@kraktus
Copy link
Contributor

@kraktus kraktus commented Dec 29, 2022

the hashes of the text were forgotten.

the hashes of the text were forgotten.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 29, 2022

r? @davidtwco

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 29, 2022
@Noratrieb
Copy link
Member

r? Nilstrieb
@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 29, 2022

📌 Commit d08134f has been approved by Nilstrieb

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rustbot rustbot assigned Noratrieb and unassigned davidtwco Dec 29, 2022
@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 29, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 30, 2022

⌛ Testing commit d08134f with merge e5e5fcb...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 30, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Nilstrieb
Pushing e5e5fcb to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Dec 30, 2022
@bors bors merged commit e5e5fcb into rust-lang:master Dec 30, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.68.0 milestone Dec 30, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (e5e5fcb): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.3% [-0.5%, -0.2%] 17
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.3% [-0.7%, -0.2%] 15
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.3% [-0.5%, -0.2%] 17

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.4% [2.4%, 2.4%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-5.6% [-5.7%, -5.4%] 3
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

@Noratrieb
Copy link
Member

That's some interesting perf numbers. Just noise/bimodality but very weird that even a comment change would trigger this.

cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance

Aaron1011 pushed a commit to Aaron1011/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2023
fix comment for `TokenCursor::desugar`

the hashes of the text were forgotten.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants