-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.9k
RFC 2203 not implemented inside a const block #65732
Copy link
Copy link
Closed
Labels
A-const-evalArea: Constant evaluation, covers all const contexts (static, const fn, ...)Area: Constant evaluation, covers all const contexts (static, const fn, ...)B-unstableBlocker: Implemented in the nightly compiler and unstable.Blocker: Implemented in the nightly compiler and unstable.C-bugCategory: This is a bug.Category: This is a bug.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.requires-nightlyThis issue requires a nightly compiler in some way. When possible, use a F-* label instead.This issue requires a nightly compiler in some way. When possible, use a F-* label instead.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
A-const-evalArea: Constant evaluation, covers all const contexts (static, const fn, ...)Area: Constant evaluation, covers all const contexts (static, const fn, ...)B-unstableBlocker: Implemented in the nightly compiler and unstable.Blocker: Implemented in the nightly compiler and unstable.C-bugCategory: This is a bug.Category: This is a bug.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.requires-nightlyThis issue requires a nightly compiler in some way. When possible, use a F-* label instead.This issue requires a nightly compiler in some way. When possible, use a F-* label instead.
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
Thanks to RFC 2203, code like the following compiles on nightly:
However, as pointed out by @RalfJung, the same code fails to compile in a
constblock (Playground):Currently, there's two distinct implementations for promotion of temps, one for
fnandconst fnand one forconstandstatic. RFC 2203 is implemented for the first but not the second.I didn't see an actual issue for this. I'll close this as a dupe if @RalfJung already opened one.
cc #49147