-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.9k
Tracking issue for future-incompatibility lint float_literal_f32_fallback #154024
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Labels
C-future-incompatibilityCategory: Future-incompatibility lintsCategory: Future-incompatibility lintsC-tracking-issueCategory: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFCCategory: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFCF-f16_and_f128`#![feature(f16)]`, `#![feature(f128)]``#![feature(f16)]`, `#![feature(f128)]`T-langRelevant to the language teamRelevant to the language team
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
C-future-incompatibilityCategory: Future-incompatibility lintsCategory: Future-incompatibility lintsC-tracking-issueCategory: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFCCategory: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFCF-f16_and_f128`#![feature(f16)]`, `#![feature(f128)]``#![feature(f16)]`, `#![feature(f128)]`T-langRelevant to the language teamRelevant to the language team
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
Lint on cases where
{float}falls back tof32instead of the defaultf64.If there is only a single instance of a trait, like
From<f32> for f32, it is used to guide type inference. That enables expressions likef32::from(0.0). With the addition ofFrom<f16> for f32this mechanism breaks, and the example would stop to compile.To prevent this breakage, a workaround was introduced in the type checker. However, we'd like to remove this workaround in the future. Hence, start emitting a warning whenever this workaround is used.
This is a tracking issue for the RFC "XXX" (rust-lang/rfcs#NNN).
About tracking issues
Tracking issues are used to record the overall progress of implementation.
They are also used as hubs connecting to other relevant issues, e.g., bugs or open design questions.
A tracking issue is however not meant for large scale discussion, questions, or bug reports about a feature.
Instead, open a dedicated issue for the specific matter and add the relevant feature gate label.
Discussion comments will get marked as off-topic or deleted.
Repeated discussions on the tracking issue may lead to the tracking issue getting locked.
Steps
instructions?)
rustfmtUnresolved Questions
XXX --- list all the "unresolved questions" found in the RFC to ensure they are
not forgotten
Implementation history