rewrite error-found-staticlib-instead-crate to rmake

Oneirical · Oneirical · commit e9ff47ff406d · 2024-06-14T15:50:33.000-04:00
diff --git a/src/tools/tidy/src/allowed_run_make_makefiles.txt b/src/tools/tidy/src/allowed_run_make_makefiles.txt
@@ -38,7 +38,6 @@ run-make/emit-shared-files/Makefile
 run-make/emit-stack-sizes/Makefile
 run-make/emit-to-stdout/Makefile
 run-make/env-dep-info/Makefile
-run-make/error-found-staticlib-instead-crate/Makefile
 run-make/error-writing-dependencies/Makefile
 run-make/export-executable-symbols/Makefile
 run-make/extern-diff-internal-name/Makefile
diff --git a/tests/run-make/error-found-staticlib-instead-crate/Makefile b/tests/run-make/error-found-staticlib-instead-crate/Makefile
diff --git a/tests/run-make/error-found-staticlib-instead-crate/rmake.rs b/tests/run-make/error-found-staticlib-instead-crate/rmake.rs
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+// When rustc is looking for a crate but is given a staticlib instead,
+// the error message should be helpful and indicate precisely the cause
+// of the compilation failure.
+// See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/21978
+
+use run_make_support::rustc;
+
+fn main() {
+    rustc().input("foo.rs").crate_type("staticlib").run();
+    rustc().input("bar.rs").run_fail().assert_stderr_contains("found staticlib");
+}
