revert(lint): Remove new_implicit_minimum_version_req (#16321)#17249
Merged
Conversation
) Concern was raised at https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/246057-t-cargo/topic/Reviewing.20the.20linting.20system/near/610736683. Deferring this out to not hold up the linting system. We'll need to re-open rust-lang#15577
rustbot
added
A-documenting-cargo-itself
Collaborator
|
r? @weihanglo rustbot has assigned @weihanglo. Use Why was this reviewer chosen?The reviewer was selected based on:
|
weihanglo
reviewed
Jul 21, 2026
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do we want to remove or keep it an unstable lint?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Feels not worth it to add a feature gate for this. May also be good to not anchor us to the current implementation when discussing how the problem should be handled.
Collaborator
|
This PR was rebased onto a different master commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed. Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers. |
weihanglo
approved these changes
Jul 21, 2026
weihanglo
enabled auto-merge
July 21, 2026 15:30
rustbot
removed
the
S-waiting-on-review
rust-bors Bot
pushed a commit
to rust-lang/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 25, 2026
Update cargo submodule 17 commits in 3efb1f477e99b42974b982d939fd100303cdf7db..54b61f13a4eea47ec3ee95237d4107976d7909ed 2026-07-17 23:53:19 +0000 to 2026-07-24 13:23:18 +0000 - chore: bump to `[email protected]+1.9.6` (rust-lang/cargo#17259) - Enable build-dir layout v2 on nightly by default (rust-lang/cargo#17258) - fix(path): clarify error message when path dependency has wrong package (rust-lang/cargo#16927) - fix(toml): warn on hyphenated lint names and duplicates (rust-lang/cargo#17051) - fix(test): gate trim-paths tests on split debuginfo support (rust-lang/cargo#17256) - test(git): Explicitly test for git injection attacks (rust-lang/cargo#17253) - fix(git): Suggest libgit2 if git-cli fails (rust-lang/cargo#17252) - fix(diag): bound transitive unused dependency traversal (rust-lang/cargo#17251) - fix(git): Hide git fetch output without progress (rust-lang/cargo#17243) - revert(lint): Remove `new_implicit_minimum_version_req` (rust-lang/cargo#16321) (rust-lang/cargo#17249) - fix: Add haiku's dylib path (rust-lang/cargo#17248) - Zsh completion: Add `-p` and `--package` flags for `cargo add` (rust-lang/cargo#17247) - refactor(source): Clarify the name of the remote git registry (rust-lang/cargo#17240) - fix(timings): only report units the job queue actually ran (rust-lang/cargo#17238) - Do not include proc-macro deps in rustc search path args (rust-lang/cargo#17236) - chore(deps): update cargo-semver-checks to v0.49.0 (rust-lang/cargo#17237) - rustdoc: rename the doc parts metadata params (rust-lang/cargo#17234) r? ghost
rust-bors Bot
pushed a commit
to rust-lang/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 25, 2026
Update cargo submodule 17 commits in 3efb1f477e99b42974b982d939fd100303cdf7db..54b61f13a4eea47ec3ee95237d4107976d7909ed 2026-07-17 23:53:19 +0000 to 2026-07-24 13:23:18 +0000 - chore: bump to `[email protected]+1.9.6` (rust-lang/cargo#17259) - Enable build-dir layout v2 on nightly by default (rust-lang/cargo#17258) - fix(path): clarify error message when path dependency has wrong package (rust-lang/cargo#16927) - fix(toml): warn on hyphenated lint names and duplicates (rust-lang/cargo#17051) - fix(test): gate trim-paths tests on split debuginfo support (rust-lang/cargo#17256) - test(git): Explicitly test for git injection attacks (rust-lang/cargo#17253) - fix(git): Suggest libgit2 if git-cli fails (rust-lang/cargo#17252) - fix(diag): bound transitive unused dependency traversal (rust-lang/cargo#17251) - fix(git): Hide git fetch output without progress (rust-lang/cargo#17243) - revert(lint): Remove `new_implicit_minimum_version_req` (rust-lang/cargo#16321) (rust-lang/cargo#17249) - fix: Add haiku's dylib path (rust-lang/cargo#17248) - Zsh completion: Add `-p` and `--package` flags for `cargo add` (rust-lang/cargo#17247) - refactor(source): Clarify the name of the remote git registry (rust-lang/cargo#17240) - fix(timings): only report units the job queue actually ran (rust-lang/cargo#17238) - Do not include proc-macro deps in rustc search path args (rust-lang/cargo#17236) - chore(deps): update cargo-semver-checks to v0.49.0 (rust-lang/cargo#17237) - rustdoc: rename the doc parts metadata params (rust-lang/cargo#17234) r? ghost
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR try to resolve?
Concern was raised at
https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/246057-t-cargo/topic/Reviewing.20the.20linting.20system/near/610736683. Deferring this out to not hold up the linting system.
We'll need to re-open #15577
How to test and review this PR?